Advertisement

HindustanTimes Fri,18 Apr 2014

62 JEE applicants seek re-evaluation

Vanita Srivastava , Hindustan Times  New Delhi, June 18, 2013
First Published: 00:40 IST(18/6/2013) | Last Updated: 01:52 IST(18/6/2013)

Four days after the answer sheets of candidates who had taken the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) 2013 were put on a website, only 62 students have applied for re-evaluation.

Advertisement

Last year, the JEE office had received as many as 258 applications for re-evaluation. But the number of papers were 9 lakh as 4.5 lakh students had appeared in 2012.

“We have got around 62 applications for re-evaluation. The number may be even less as some applications could be faulty. Considering the fact that there were 3 lakh papers (two for each candidate), this is a very small number,” Dr H C Gupta, organising chairman, JEE (Advanced) — 2013, said.

Last year, it was for the first time that IIT uploaded the corrected optical response sheets of all the candidates on the JEE website to maintain transparency and avoid any errors.

This year the evaluated answer sheets were made available online from June 13 to June 17.  The student had to pay R500 for each question to be reviewed.

“The initiative of providing solutions and uploading the answer sheets of the aspirants before declaring the results has been a great success. This year we have done double scanning and even used image integration for minimising any error in evaluation,” Dr Gupta said.

Compared to last year when IIT had admitted to two questions being incorrect and had given no marks to candidates in both, this year no question has been declared incorrect.

“After getting feedback and proper examination, we have simply  allowed flexibility in options in two questions , one in paper I (maths) and another in paper 2 (physics),” he added.

Nearly 1.5 lakh students had appeared for the exam.

Advertisement
more from New Delhi

Delhi: HIV patient gets 7 years' jail for robbery

A Delhi court has sentenced an HIV-positive man and his wife to seven years in jail for robbery and house trespassing. The court said there were no grounds for leniency on account of health since such crimes were on the rise and needed to be curbed.

Advertisement
Most Popular
Advertisement
Copyright © 2014 HT Media Limited. All Rights Reserved