Advertisement

HindustanTimes Thu,17 Apr 2014

SC refuses to pass order on plea against Kapil Sibal

HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times  New Delhi, July 11, 2011
First Published: 17:18 IST(11/7/2011) | Last Updated: 23:03 IST(11/7/2011)

In a relief to Union telecom minister Kapil Sibal, the Supreme Court on Monday refused to pass any order on a plea seeking the CBI probe against the minister.

Advertisement

The allegations were that Sibal had favoured Anil Ambani-owned Reliance Infocomm by reducing a penalty imposed on the company for alleged violations of the licence condition.

The special bench of Justice GS Singhvi and Justice AK Ganguly said: “No orders are required.” The court's verbal direction came after advocate Prashant  Bhushan requested the court to direct the CBI from investigating Sibal's decision to reduce the penalty imposed by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) on  RComm from R50 crore to R5 crore.

“We have indicated our mind,” the bench said when senior advocate Rohinton Nariman, who appeared for the government replacing solicitor general Gopal Subramanium, asked the court to pass formal orders.

“Let his affidavit not be taken on the file," Nariman said opposing the allegations made in the latest affidavit filed by NGO Centre for Public Interest and Litigation. Declining to entertain Bhushan's affidavit, the court said: “If there is any irregularity allegedly connected whatsoever with telecom, it cannot be linked to the 2G. If there is a cause of action arising, remedy can be availed at the appropriate forum. Whether it's right or wrong (Sibal's decision), a separate cause of action arises. It is open for the CBI to investigate.”

The court also refrained from passing any order on Bhushan's second plea to appoint two independent persons to assist the court in evaluating CBI and enforcement directorate's investigation. “This amounts to outsourcing our own work,” the  bench commented.

Advertisement
more from New Delhi

Delhi: HIV patient gets 7 years' jail for robbery

A Delhi court has sentenced an HIV-positive man and his wife to seven years in jail for robbery and house trespassing. The court said there were no grounds for leniency on account of health since such crimes were on the rise and needed to be curbed.

Advertisement
Most Popular
Advertisement
Copyright © 2014 HT Media Limited. All Rights Reserved