Advertisement

HindustanTimes Thu,17 Apr 2014

Security drive: Cops face action for encroachment 'leniency'

HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times  New Delhi, November 12, 2012
First Published: 00:20 IST(12/11/2012) | Last Updated: 02:04 IST(12/11/2012)

A novel bid at securing the Capital against a possible terrorist onslaught during the festival season has resulted in the suspension of a dozen policemen.

Advertisement

In addition to measures such as penalising landlords with unverified tenants and servants apparently to dissuade terror operatives from seeking shelter deviously - a special drive against police personnel abetting encroachments across Delhi's busy markets has begun.

"Orders to begin the drive were issued on Thursday after our vigilance department produced photographs of encroachment in about a dozen markets in the city. The drive will continue till Diwali," said Dharmendra Kumar, special commissioner of police (law and order).

According to sources, pictures of the encroachments - where explosive devices could be planted for a possible terror bid during Diwali - were taken in Greater Kailash, Rajouri Garden, Krishna Nagar and three to four other markets.

Pictures of their evident "leniency" prompted the suspension of about 12 policemen being suspended over three days.

Traders protest
The effects of the drive, however, were reported from south Delhi's INA market even a day before it was officially launched when shopkeepers were issued orders to limit their businesses within their shutters.

Ramesh Bhutani, who has been doing business in the market for over 40 years, said: "Most of these are shops have a size of 8ftx10ft. How will a shopkeeper survive despite this space crunch if he is not allowed a bit of leeway?"

"Punitive measures against errant personnel will continue," special CP Kumar added.

Advertisement
more from New Delhi

Delhi: HIV patient gets 7 years' jail for robbery

A Delhi court has sentenced an HIV-positive man and his wife to seven years in jail for robbery and house trespassing. The court said there were no grounds for leniency on account of health since such crimes were on the rise and needed to be curbed.

Advertisement
Most Popular
Advertisement
Copyright © 2014 HT Media Limited. All Rights Reserved