Advertisement

HindustanTimes Wed,16 Apr 2014

What’ll you do for tigers: SC to govt

Bhadra Sinha, Hindustan Times  New Delhi, August 22, 2012
First Published: 15:45 IST(22/8/2012) | Last Updated: 02:11 IST(23/8/2012)

Extending the ban on tourist activities in tiger reserves till August 29, the Supreme Court Wednesday came down hard on the government, saying it was more worried about commerce than tiger conservation.

Advertisement

On July 24, the court banned tourism activity in the core areas of tiger reserves. The Centre had cited the National Tiger Conservation Authority guidelines to put a stop to tourism in the big cat’s habitat. On Wednesday, it sought a review of these guidelines.

“We want to know on what basis you want to do it (review)? Why did you initially recommend the ban?” the court asked.

In a fresh affidavit, the ministry of environment and forests Tuesday requested time to revisit the guidelines. http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2012/8/23_08_12-metro1b.jpg

It said a fresh consultation process was required in wake of suggestions, objections and apprehensions expressed by various states.

The bench — justice AK Patnaik and justice Swatanter Kumar — refused to alter the ban order.

"What are you going to do to save tigers? Earlier it was 13,000, now it has come down to 1,200. You are more worried about the commercial activities," the court said.

Extending the ban to August 29, next date of hearing, the bench said, "The Union of India has not done anything except filling affidavits."

The ban would threaten wildlife as many locals depended on tourism for livelihood and would lead to discontent, the Centre said.

As per the July 24 direction, states also have to notify buffer zones that constitute the fringe areas of reserves. Breeding takes place in these areas.

Advertisement
more from New Delhi

Delhi: HIV patient gets 7 years' jail for robbery

A Delhi court has sentenced an HIV-positive man and his wife to seven years in jail for robbery and house trespassing. The court said there were no grounds for leniency on account of health since such crimes were on the rise and needed to be curbed.

Advertisement
Most Popular
Advertisement
Copyright © 2014 HT Media Limited. All Rights Reserved