"We are of the view that on facts, as well as on law, the ONGC and the Government of India have taken a prudent commercial and economic decision in public interest. We are not prepared to say that the decision is mala fide or actuated by any extraneous or irrelevant considerations or improper motive," a bench of justices KS Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra said.
"We notice that the ONGC and the Government of India have considered various commercial and technical aspects flowing from the Production Sharing Contract (PSC) and also its advantages that ONGC would derive if the Cairn and Vedanta deal was approved," it said.
The court passed the order on a PIL alleging that there was a clause in the agreement between Cairn group and ONGC that in case Cairn Group wanted to sell its shares in Cairn India, it would first offer the same to ONGC and this right was "not asserted" by the PSU and the Centre.
The bench after going through all the aspects came to the conclusion that the decision taken by ONGC not to exercise its Right of First Refusal (RoFR) was taken after elaborate and due deliberations as the price of shares was in excess of intrinsic value.
"The report of SBI Caps, after making a detailed financial analysis, also supported the decision taken by the ONGC. The decision to grant no objection to the transfer of shares of CEIL (Cairn Energy India Pvt. Ltd.) from Cairn to Vedanta was also on the basis that the proposed price of share was at Rs.355 per share, was well in excess of its intrinsic value as were evaluated by SBI," the bench said, adding that SBI had evaluated each share of CEIL at Rs. 291.