When asked whether he would also use the same term for the then prime minister in the light of 1984 riots, Khurshid said that he is not in the world today but Modi is among us as a claimant of prime minister's post and he is answerable to the incidents taking place during his tenure.Read: Rahul pulls up Khurshid for calling Modi 'impotent'On a day's visit to his parliamentary constituency in Farrukhabad, Khurshid said, "Had Modi fulfilled his duties as per his post, the then prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee would not have advised him to follow 'rajdharm'."
"Had he been well today, Atalji would have supported me," Khurshid said adding that he himself has learnt a lot from him (Atal)... he had a very impressive personality.
Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi on February 27 said that he does not approve of the comments by Khurshid against the Gujarat chief minister.
On February 26, without taking the name of Modi, Khurshid, who is a sitting MP from Farrukhabad, described him as "impotent" and asked why a man who aspires to be the prime minister of the country could not do anything during the 2002 riots. The remark invited a sharp condemnation from the BJP.Read: BJP slams Khurshid for calling Modi 'impotent', says Cong 'frustrated'