The court order had come on a lawsuit filed by the rights groups Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), which claimed it had served summons on Gandhi when she had allegedly visited Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in the city for a medical check-up in September last year.
The lawsuit against Gandhi hinges on the issue of whether she was served summons on September 9 as the group claims or whether she was not present in the US during that time as per her assertion.
The SFJ has sought compensatory and punitive damages from Gandhi for her alleged role in “shielding and protecting” Congress leaders, including Kamal Nath, Sajjan Kumar and Jagdish Tytler, from prosecution for their alleged role in the 1984 riots.
Gandhi’s attorney Ravi Batra on Monday submitted before the court that his client had “nothing to hide”.
Batra handed over to court as exhibit a letter dated April 5 signed by Gandhi to him in which she states that “in matters of disclosure of my travels, which are contained in the passport document, the Government of India has informed me that they would not permit such a disclosure”.
Batra, in his submission to court, said he was informed over the weekend that the Indian government had refused to permit the release of 67-year-old Gandhi’s passport because of “concerns with respect to her personal security and keeping confidential the methods used to protect her.