The bench also wanted to know if the same will have an impact on tax-payers. The court posed the question after the petitioner assailed the Centre’s decision to exempt Russian reactor manufacturer firm from liability in case of an accident due to a defect in the reactor.
The court fixed October 11 as the next date of hearing and also directed the petitioner to implead the National Disaster Management Authority after his counsel claimed the government had not complied with the statutory guidelines framed by the authority regarding nuclear safety.
Petitioner, social activist G Sundarajan, submitted that the safety measures recommended by the Atomic Energy Regulation Board (AERB) have not been put in place and government agencies have not determined till date the site for storing spent nuclear fuel.
“Instead of dealing with these issues and addressing the concerns in a meaningful way, the government has launched a wave of repression and has slapped 8,000 sedition cases against peaceful protesters,” said advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner.
The bench, however, refused to pass any order on Bhushan’s plea to pass an interim order to restrain the government from commissioning the plant.