The bench also said a selected student is entitled to admission, but "equally, it is the solemn responsibility on the part of the university to consider the past conduct of the student even if such student was ranked for the admission.
"If the admission of the appellant is not conducive for good administration of the university and if it affects the discipline among other students, it would be well within its right to refuse admission," the bench added.
The "responsibility" of an institute is to not only impart education but also to "inculcate" discipline, it said.
The court made the observation, while upholding the decision of a single judge bench, which had dismissed the plea of Hamidur Rehman that he was "arbitrarily" denied admission in MA (Persian) by Jamia Millia Islamia for academic session 2012-14.
Rehman had also said he ranked 21st in the test, held for admission for total 30 seats and the university admitted only 20 students to deny him the admission.
The court dismissed the appeal also taking note of reports from "heads of each of the departments, which stated that the appellant was offensive and aggressive against the university".
"We find that the denial of admission of the appellant is not unjustified, unfair or arbitrary and for that reason, the appellant cannot seek admission as a matter of right," it said.