Four years ago, when Czech car maker Skoda launched its first SUV, the Yeti, in India, there was no “compact SUV” category in the market. Even in today’s ter ms, the Yeti probably fits squarely in this category, but in 2010, India did not have an appetite for a car as European as the Yeti, and it never found many takers. However, the Yeti did remain a desirable car in the minds of the consumer, and always had capablity to hold its own on the road.

Times have changed, and so has the consumer, so Yeti is making its second coming. Is it still desirable?

Subtle Changes

Skoda would like you to believe there are dozens of changes, but Yeti 2.0 essentially retains the stance and technology of the outgoing version. At just over 4.2 metres long, it will not inconvenience you in city traffic, while 180mm ground clearance ensures you g et that vantage view that is so essential in an urban SUV.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/popup/2014/9/skodayet.jpg

Some changes are worth mentioning, though. The front headlamps are new, with horizontal daytime running lights seen in the new Octavia. The tail lamp cluster is also new, but the car retains the hatch-like persona with its chopped roof. Yeti 2.0 is a chip off the old block.

Intel Inside

Apart from a new steering wheel, the interiors are pretty much unchanged, and there is little to complain about. The Yeti has an uncluttered dashboard design and remarkable build quality. There is nothing flashy as some cars these days tend to be (read Mahindra and Hyundai) but barring a USB slot, there is nothing you would really miss. Bluetooth connectivity makes up for it. The wheelbase at under 2.6 metres makes the rear seats a trifle cramped, and the car is not wide enough to accommodate three adults at the rear, so it is strictly a comfortable four-seater with a decent 416-litre boot.

Pleasant Drive

The car is offered in two variants — front-wheel and allwheel drive—that share the same 2.0-litre turbocharged diesel engine. India does not get petrol versions, and they may not be required either. Nobody would buy a Yeti only for daily commuting. The engine has been tuned according to the vehicle’s capabilities so that front wheel drive versions makes 110 PS power and 250 Nm torque, while the allwheel drive gets bumped up power at 140 PS and 320 Nm torque. The latter also gets an extra gear in a 6-speed manual transmission, but an automatic variant is absent.

Both versions are fun to drive. For everyday use, the 4x2 is more than sufficient. The low-end torque ensures smooth in-gear acceleration without compromising on top-end power. The suspension is on the stiffer side, as you would expect from a European car, but it corners remarkably well and that more than offsets the demerits.

The extra power and torque in the 4x4 comes in handy when off roading, but Yeti is not really a true blue off-roader. Its biggest advantage is the dimensions, which never overwhelm you, and the knowledge that you are in control, always.

The biggest criticism for the outgoing Yeti was its price, and that only gets worse with the new one. At Rs. 19-21 lakh in Delhi, this is not a cheap vehicle. It does not behave like one either, but at that rarified price altitude, buyers would become aware of how close they are to an Audi Q3 or a Toyota Fortuner, and most may choose to climb on.

Honda ahead, by a whisker

Sumant Banerji , Hindustan Times
First Published: 01:51 IST(12/7/2013)
Last Updated: 11:42 IST(17/7/2013)
Share  more.
One is an established bestseller that has had an unfettered reign at the top of the segment for half a decade, a reign it seemed poised to extend when its boot turned even smaller in its last facelift. The other is the new kid on the block - but from one of the more tech-savvy automakers in the world. True to its badge, the Honda Amaze, built on the Brio platform, is the fruit of many hours of research. Which of these then, does one pick?

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/7/cars-12-07.jpg

Do looks matter?

If they do, it is difficult to tell which is better. The novelty value of both the cars have worn off largely because their compact versions have already been on the road for some time. With the Dzire, it is even more so not only because it is the older car but also as its mid life facelift last year did precious little change to its design apart from the cropped boot. http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/7/12_07_13-buss-04.jpg

While the Dzire has more curves and looks bigger (to some extent, it actually is), the Amaze has more sharp edges and straight lines, more in tune with modern cars. From the front the twin chrome slats in the grille differentiate it from the Brio. The lines of the boot flow smoothly, and it does not look like an after-thought. It is in some ways the more proportionate car. However, at the rear it lacks the edginess of the Brio.

The Dzire has aged well and the smaller boot actually makes it look much better than the old version, but with so many of them on the road — some even as cabs — the drool factor is clearly missing.

The inside story

The Dzire is a more inspiring story here. The waterfall design that stems from its executive sedan Kizashi, gives it a more upmarket feel. The dual-tone dashboard has a contemporary feel, the steering feels chunky, and the cabin is well put together. Fit and finish are impressive. For the Amaze, this is the weak point. The dashboard and instrument panel feel dull, as the thrust has been on functionality over largesse. Everything is there, but you might miss it due to the dull presentation. An example is the glovebox lid, which does not seem to slot well — while it actually does.

The one point where the Amaze does score is on space: be it the rear leg room or boot space, it has the goods.

Performance, ride and handling http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/7/12_07_13-buss-05.jpg

The two cars are powered by different engines but with similar functional qualities. In its petrol avatar, the Amaze has a 1.2-litre powertrain that develops 88 horsepower and 109 Nm torque, which compares favourably with the Dzire’s similarly-sized engine that has similar specifications. Both cars feel a little underpowered and strained at high speeds, but the Amaze handles better and offers more refinement in terms of less engine noise.

The story is different in the diesel versions. The Dzire shares the 1.3-litre multijet engine of the Swift, which is smaller than Honda’s 1.5-litre iDTec. This is Honda’s maiden attempt at a diesel engine of this size. While the Dzire is no match to the Amaze on outright power and acceleration, Honda falters on the finer aspects. 

For all its grunt, the diesel engine is noisy, with vibrations coming through the steering wheel and pedals even when cruising. For all its lack of power and propensity to understeer, the Dzire suffers from no such malaise.

Fuel economy

Hondas are notoriously frugal. So are Marutis. There is little to choose on the petrol variant with both offering similar economies. In diesel, the Amaze has a clear edge, with a claimed ARAI mileage of 25.8 kpl that makes it the most fuel efficient car in India. That may be an exaggeration, but it easily gives 21 kpl on the highway and 18 kpl in city, with AC on. That is a good 15% over the Dzire. 

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/7/12_07_13-buss-06.jpg

Verdict: Value for money

It has taken Honda some time to show what it can do with diesel technology. In fact, even Suzuki does not have a small diesel engine, and the one on the Swift and Dzire is sourced from Fiat. Where Honda does score is in the pricing. On a level playing field, the scales do tilt in favour of the Amaze, with more space, and outright power and fuel economy in diesel. Unless you want your car as silent as a tomb — which the diesel Amaze surely is not.


Share  more.
comment Note: By posting your comments here you agree to the terms and conditions of www.hindustantimes.com
comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Advertisement
more »