Seeking to assuage investor concerns ahead of implementation of GAAR from April 1, the tax department today said the provisions of tax avoidance rules will not apply to a transaction that does not carry a tax benefit based on the jurisdiction it is routed through.
It said adequate procedural safeguards are in place to ensure that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), which seek to prevent companies from routing transactions through other countries to avoid taxes, are invoked in “a uniform, fair and rational manner”.
GAAR, it said, will come into force from April 1 and can be invoked only through a two-stage process involving a nod at the level of principal commissioner of income tax and a panel headed by a high court judge.
The new rules give tax authorities the right to scrutinise and tax transactions which they believe are structured solely to avoid taxes.
But it “will not interplay with the right of the taxpayer to select or choose method of implementing a transaction”, the Central Board of Direct Taxes said in clarifications on GAAR.
GAAR provisions shall be effective from assessment year 2018-19 and “shall not be invoked merely on the ground that the entity is located in a tax efficient jurisdiction,” it said. “If the jurisdiction of FPI is finalised based on non-tax commercial considerations and the main purpose of the arrangement is not to obtain tax benefit, GAAR will not apply.”
This essentially means that any transaction that carries a tax benefit could be questioned. The taxman may potentially want to know whether the transaction was done in the normal course of business or conducted simply with the intention to avoid taxes.
India will be the 17th nation in the world to have laws that aim to close tax loopholes. Beginning with Australia in 1915, GAAR is in force in nations like Singapore, China and the UK.
CBDT said the adoption of anti-abuse rules in tax treaties may not be sufficient to address all tax avoidance strategies and the same are required to be tackled through domestic anti-avoidance rules.
“However, if a case of avoidance is sufficiently addressed by Limitation of Benefits (LoB) provisions in the tax treaty, there shall not be an occasion to invoke GAAR,” it said.