Nusli Wadia hits back on Tata’s proposal to remove him as director | business-news | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Mar 25, 2017-Saturday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

Nusli Wadia hits back on Tata’s proposal to remove him as director

business Updated: Dec 13, 2016 01:42 IST
Nusli Wadia

Tata Motors Director Nusli Wadia arrives for Tata Motors' board meeting at Bombay House in Mumbai on Monday. (PTI Photo)

With Tata Sons seeking to remove him as director from main listed group entities, Nusli Wadia on Monday hit back saying he has been targeted for his “independence of mind and action” and he is not required to act in their interest as he does not serve the Tata group in any capacity.

In a letter to the shareholders of Tata Steel, which has convened an EGM on December 21 to consider a resolution by Tata Sons to remove Cyrus Mistry and him as directors, Wadia said several allegations levelled against him were false, unsubstantiated and baseless.

Read | Nusli Wadia to go ahead with defamation case against Tata Group

Terming the allegation that he has acted in concert with Mistry as “totally false and baseless”, he wrote: “My actions as an independent director are totally independent and not linked to any individual.”

Stating that he is the only Independent director that Tata Sons has sought to remove from Tata Steel, Tata Chemicals and Tata Motors, Wadia said: “The reasons for which I am being sought to be removed as director is my independence of mind and action...”

Reacting to the allegation that he was acting against the interest of the group, he said: “I do not serve the Tata group in any capacity and I am not required to act in their interest. The statement is irrelevant to my position as an Independent Director of Tata Steel. It is also baseless and unsubstantiated.

“I have a fiduciary responsibility to act as an Independent director in the best interest of the companies on whose board I serve, no more or less.”

He further said, “My independent stand has aggravated Tata Sons and my removal is being sought because I chose not to follow their diktat. My fiduciary duty is to your company and not to an unidentified Tata group.”

Wadia further said Tata Sons’ principal allegations against him “are unsubstantiated, baseless, false, motivated, defamatory and libellous and have been made with the intention of harming my reputation.”

He also claimed that it was “the first time in the history of corporate India that a promoter is using his muscle power with false and vindictive allegations to remove an Independent director”.

“Although it is my removal that you are being asked to vote upon, the real ‘person’ on trial is the institution of the independent director itself and not me,” he said.

Underlining his actions as an independent director, Wadia recalled that he differed “strongly” with Ratan Tata “in the acquisition of Corus but a decision was ultimately taken by consensus”.

Read | Nusli Wadia Vs Tata: From friends to foes