Trai says, Reliance Jio complimentary offer not in sync with regulations | business-news | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Jul 26, 2017-Wednesday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Trai says, Reliance Jio complimentary offer not in sync with regulations

Trai Chairman R S Sharma today said the telecom regulator has advised Reliance Jio to stop ‘complimentary’ service offer as it was not in accordance with the regulatory framework.

business Updated: Apr 07, 2017 17:47 IST
PTI
TRAI Chairman R S Sharma speaks during the opening session of a discussion on 'What, Why and How: Consumer broadband labels - Empowering Consumer Choice'.
TRAI Chairman R S Sharma speaks during the opening session of a discussion on 'What, Why and How: Consumer broadband labels - Empowering Consumer Choice'.(PTI)

Trai Chairman R S Sharma today said the telecom regulator has advised Mukesh Ambani--led Reliance Jio to stop ‘complimentary’ service offer as it was not in accordance with the regulatory framework.

“We examined it and found that it was not in accordance with regulatory framework, so we advised them to stop it,” Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) Chairman R S Sharma told PTI.

The regulator yesterday asked Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Jio to withdraw the three-month ‘complimentary’ offer of unlimited data usage and free calls on payment of a minimum Rs 303.

The order came days after Jio announced that it has clocked 72 million paid users and is extending its one-time Rs 99 payment membership programme Prime for 15 more days till April 15.

Reliance Jio said it accepts Trai’s decision and is in the process of “fully complying” with the regulator’s advice.

Trai had previously found nothing wrong with its extended promotional offers of free data and voice that had helped Jio clock 100 million customers. Of these at least 72 million opted for paid services.

Trai Secretary Sudhir Gupta said that the regulator had asked Reliance Jio to explain how its Summer Surprise offer fits into the regulatory framework, but did not find the operators’ response satisfactory.

“On April 1, we had asked Jio for certain details (of the complimentary offer) and had called them on April 5 for a discussion. We asked them how the three-month complimentary benefits fit into the regulatory framework, and the explanation given by Jio to us was not satisfactory,” he said.

He clarified that while the previous free offers had been made under a ‘promotional plan’, the Summer Surprise offer was described by the company as special benefit given to existing tariff plan which was not “fitting into the current regulatory framework”.

He, however, said that the customers who have already subscribed to the said scheme can avail the benefits till June-end. He also said that Jio will be required to roll back the offer in shortest possible time.

“It’s difficult to say...in large networks to stop something...it takes some time...it can be a few hours, one or one and half days,” Gupta said, adding that the said complimentary scheme cannot go on till April 15.

Cellular body COAI said that the Trai’s move to stop the three month complimentary offer would reduce the deterioration in industry’s revenue.

“When the regulator establishes a level-playing-field, the market forces establish the right price points,” COAI director general Rajan Mathews said, terming the withdrawal of the offer as a “relief” for the industry.

“We appreciate the decision of Trai because continuation of the offer would have increased the financial stress of the industry and the cascading implication for banks and equipment manufacturers,” Mathews said.

Previously, the incumbent players such as Airtel and Idea Cellular had moved the telecom tribunal against regulator Trai for letting the new operator continue the promotional offer beyond the stipulated 90 days.

They had also questioned the free offers on the ground that it violates the floor of 14 paise per minute set in the form of call termination charges.

The operators had alleged that such freebies not only hit their profitability and disrupted the market but were also against the regulations.