Foreign investors cry foul over Indian tax ‘surprise’, seek clarity | business | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Feb 20, 2017-Monday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Foreign investors cry foul over Indian tax ‘surprise’, seek clarity

business Updated: Apr 02, 2015 23:34 IST
Tax

US and European investor groups have called for the Indian government to urgently clarify its tax regime for foreigners, following “surprise” attempts by tax inspectors to claw back money they say is owed on years of previously untaxed gains.

International funds and banks could face a bill of as much as $8 billion, said tax experts, just as many foreign investors are poised to pour money into India following the election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has pledged to create a more business-friendly environment.

“This development has caught everyone by surprise and is extremely worrying for foreign investors,” said Patrick Pang, a managing director at the Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (ASIFMA) in Hong Kong. “It suggests that the Indian government can come out at any time and re-clarify what was believed to be an established tax policy on foreign investments.”

In many jurisdictions, governments use a form of Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) to ensure that tax breaks don’t pull domestic companies’ effective tax rate below a minimum threshold. Foreigners without local operations are not typically covered by such provisions.

In India, foreign investors have hitherto paid 15% on short-term listed equity gains, five percent on gains from bonds, and nothing on long-term gains.

But starting late last year, many firms received notices from tax inspectors requiring them to pay MAT, potentially bringing overall tax on these gains to as much as 20 %.

The following month finance minister Arun Jaitley intervened via the 2015 budget bill to state that capital gains made by foreign investors as of April 2015 were exempt from MAT, but that did not resolve the issue.

“The government’s clarification in February, though right in intent, has created unwanted confusion. The view the tax office is taking is that, by implication, the past years’ gains can be subject to MAT,” said Keyur Shah, a partner in the India tax practice at EY.

A senior tax official, who declined to be identified, confirmed that the tax office believed the exemption from MAT does not apply retroactively. “There is nothing (in the budget) to suggest that it (the exemption) would apply to old cases.”