Punjab education minister suspends 2 officials for telling teachers to dress decentlycities Updated: May 09, 2017 15:44 IST
Chandigarh: Upset over the instructions sent to government school teachers to dress ‘decently’, Punjab education minister Aruna Chaudhary on Tuesday ordered the suspension of two officials of her department with immediate effect.
Chaudhary said that the department officials had sent the instructions to schools across the state at their own level without taking any order from their seniors. “These instructions reflect an old mindset. I do not agree with them. When we are encouraging girls to do well in every field and working on women empowerment, instructions on how to dress and what to wear are not acceptable,” Chaudhary said over phone.
The minister said that she had given orders to the department to place deputy director Amrish Shukla and assistant director Amarbir Singh under suspension for sending such instructions and take action against them. The instructions issued by director public instructions (secondary education) Sukhdev Singh Kahlon had asked all district education officers and school principals to ensure that teachers wear “decent” clothes to schools.
“Sarkari schoolan vich adhyapakaan duara, khas taur te ladies adhyapakaan duara, bhadkeele pehnawe pa ke apni duty keeti jaandi hai. Kai ladies teachers duara jeans-top te kai tarah de uksaau, fashionable dress pehen ke school duty keeti jaandi hai... jis da vidyarthiyan ’te asar penda hai (Teachers, particularly female teachers, wear bright/glittery clothes on duty in government schools. Many female teachers wear jeans and top, and many types of provocative and fashionable clothes on duty.....which has an effect on the students,” read the instructions.
When contacted, Shukla said he had heard that the government was initiating action against them, denying any fault or intention to embarrass it. “Someone had complained to the chief minister in writing regarding teachers not coming to schools dressed properly. The complaint letter was marked to the department. There were already instructions issued and sent to the districts on this in 2012 and endorsed again in 2014. The instructions were simply reiterated. There was probably an oversight. We should have checked with the government,” he said.