ICC disappointed at Faf du Plessis’ decision to appeal ball-tampering charge | cricket | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Jul 21, 2017-Friday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

ICC disappointed at Faf du Plessis’ decision to appeal ball-tampering charge

Faf du Plessis, who was charged by the ICC with ball tampering during the Hobart Test and was fined 100 percent of his match fee, has decided to appeal the decision.

cricket Updated: Nov 25, 2016 15:21 IST
Faf du Plessis has decided to lodge an appeal against the ball-tampering charges that were levelled by the ICC.
Faf du Plessis has decided to lodge an appeal against the ball-tampering charges that were levelled by the ICC.(REUTERS)

The International Cricket Council (ICC) have expressed disappointment at South Africa captain Faf du Plessis’s decision to lodge an appeal after he was found guilty of a ball-tampering in the second test against Australia.

Du Plessis, who was fined his entire fee for the match in Hobart, was cleared to play in the third test in Adelaide and scored a defiant century on Thursday’s opening day after walking to the wicket to a chorus of derision from the crowd.

Read More | Faf du Plessis rates Adelaide century as his best

Cricket South Africa said in a statement on Thursday he would appeal the decision, which prompted the ICC to respond before the second day’s play in Adelaide.

“The ICC is disappointed that Faf du Plessis has chosen not to accept the findings of Match Referee Andy Pycroft and will instead exercise his right to appeal,” the world governing body said in a statement.

Read More | Faf du Plessis brushes aside controversy, continues Adelaide love-affair

“A Judicial Commissioner will now be appointed to hear the appeal at the earliest opportunity.”

The 32-year-old, standing in for injured regular captain AB de Villiers, was charged after television footage showed him applying saliva to the ball while sucking on a sweet.

The ICC said on Friday the action breached the rules of cricket in relation to applying a foreign substance to the ball.

“The ICC understands that to include, but is not limited to, sunscreen, lip ice and residue from sweets,” it said in the statement.

“The ICC does not wish to prevent players from using these substances for legitimate purposes, however, any deliberate attempt to apply such substances to the ball, as was the case here, will not be acceptable.”

Du Plessis had earlier denied cheating and said he had been made a “scapegoat”.

“I still completely disagree with (the verdict). I felt like I’ve done nothing wrong,” he said before the third test.

“It’s not like I was trying to cheat or anything, I was shining the ball. It’s something that all cricketers do.”