Court no to tainted IAS officer’s bail plea | delhi | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Oct 19, 2017-Thursday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Court no to tainted IAS officer’s bail plea

A Delhi court today rejected bail to suspended IAS officer Ravi Inder Singh, arrested for divulging sensitive information on the country's internal security, saying he has committed a crime against the state and undermined its sovereignty.

delhi Updated: Dec 21, 2010 00:45 IST

A Delhi court today rejected bail to suspended IAS officer Ravi Inder Singh, arrested for divulging sensitive information on the country's internal security, saying he has committed a crime against the state and undermined its sovereignty.

"Information emanating from the government and being passed over to recipients for any consideration is a crime against the state, be it pertaining to commerce, economy or telecommunication,” Special Judge Rakesh Siddharth said.

“This is a strike against the sovereignty of the state," Siddharth added.

Singh, working as Director in the Internal Security wing of the Union Home Ministry, was arrested by the Delhi Police Special Cell on November 23 and is now lodged in the Tihar Jail under judicial custody.

"The nature of his offence, the gravity of his act and the position and the power he wields is sufficient to deny relief sought. They are all sufficient to influence witnesses and negate evidence," the judge said.

The special judge rejected Singh's bail plea also saying a stern message needs to be sent against corruption in society, especially in its higher echelons.

"Where there is an outcry of rampant corruption in the society, especially in the higher echelon of the society, a message is required to be sent, which stems from this reasonable restrictions that the society shall not brook corruption at any level," the judge said.

The court also pointed out that Singh was not at all required to pass on information to unauthorised persons.

"The applicant (Singh) had information regarding the Department of Internal Security, which he was not required to divulge to any person whatsoever," the court said.