Judges can’t escape RTI, says House panel | delhi | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Jun 28, 2017-Wednesday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Judges can’t escape RTI, says House panel

The report opens a fresh round of conflict of views between the Parliament and the judiciary, which has made public its opposition to the idea of being scanned by the public, reports Nagendar Sharma.

delhi Updated: Apr 30, 2008 02:11 IST
Nagendar Sharma

People have every right to seek details of a judge’s wealth, allegations of misconduct against him and appointments in the judiciary, according to a parliamentary panel.

“Except judicial decision-making, all other activities of administration and persons included in the judiciary are subject to the RTI Act,” said the report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Law and Justice, tabled in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday.

The report opens a fresh round of conflict of views between the Parliament and the judiciary, which has made public its opposition to the idea of being scanned by the public. Ten days ago, Chief Justice KG Balakrishnan had said he was holding a constitutional office. “Constitutional functionaries are not covered under the RTI Act,” he said.

But the House panel said it had examined the law: “We have examined in detail every clause of the RTI Bill 2004, and it is clear that all three wings of State — executive, legislature and judiciary — are fully covered under this Act.”

EM Sudarsana Natchiappan, who heads the panel, said: “When Constitutional authorities like the prime minister and Lok Sabha speaker were covered by the RTI Act, there was no question of any exemption for any other individual’s office.” Judicial decision-making doesn’t come under the Act because decisions are pronounced in open courts and consultation between judges is a privilege, he said.

Natchiappan said it was important to end the confusion prevailing on the matter, and after discussing the interpretation of various sections of the Act, “the committee was very clear that all Constitutional authorities came under the definition of public authority”.

“The pith and substance of this Act is to empower people by allowing them to seek information on those occupying high offices and making decisions which affect their lives. Any reluctance only amounts to dilution of people’s right to know,” Natchiappan said.

This is for the second time in recent days that the judiciary and Parliament are in complete disagreement with each other. Earlier, CJI Balakrishnan faced flak for refusing to make public the details of judges' assets.

Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee and Law Minister HR Bhardwaj had both disapproved of the CJI's comments, saying the details of MPs wealth were available for public scrutiny and judiciary's action was not reasonable in this regard.

The committee's report also makes the task of the government difficult. Bhardwaj, while speaking to HT on Monday, was non-committal on the implementation of the RTI Act in judiciary. "Judiciary is not an extension of the government, therefore no directions can be issued to it for the implementation of the RTI Act," he said. "I hope issues pertaining to providing information to the people would be streamlined."