‘Judges’ wealth info can’t be shared’ | Latest News Delhi - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

‘Judges’ wealth info can’t be shared’

Hindustan Times | ByNagendar Sharma, New Delhi
Nov 06, 2008 01:42 AM IST

The SC said details of judges’ wealth were “personal information” which can’t be made public, and told the Central Information Commission that there is no law which makes the declaration of judges assets mandatory, reports Nagendar Sharma.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said details of judges’ wealth were “personal information” which can’t be made public, and told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that there is no law which makes the declaration of judges assets mandatory.

HT Image
HT Image

“Details of judges assets are held by the Chief Justice of India and High Court chief justices in their personal capacities, and this is an extremely personal information,” Additional Solicitor General Amrender Sharan told the information watchdog.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

Sharan, who represented the Supreme Court before a three-member full bench of the CIC, said: “There is no law which requires the chief justices to hold information about the details of judges’ wealth, and the CJI is not an administrative authority for the judges.” Sharan’s comments came as the CIC bench heard an appeal filed by a Delhi resident, Subhash Chandra Aggarwal.

Aggarwal had approached the CIC after the Supreme Court refused him details of the declaration of judges’ assets on his application filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

The CIC bench, of Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibulah and information commissioners A.N. Tiwari and M.M. Ansari, reserved its order after hearing both sides.

Earlier, Sharan opposed the appeal and said the information has been sought on the basis of a 1997 Supreme Court resolution, which was “voluntary and if any details were made public based on this, it would amount to breach of confidentiality”.

Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan, who represented Aggarwal, countered the argument: “A resolution adopted in a full court meeting attended by 22 Supreme Court judges, including the then CJI J.S. Verma, cannot be described as informal and voluntary. It is a part of the court records and is official.”

He asked the CIC to clarify on who would provide information sought under the RTI Act from the Supreme Court. The judiciary has been consistently opposed to making public the details of judges’ wealth. CJI K.G. Balakrishnan had said his office being a “constitutional post” was not covered under the RTI Act.

Unveiling 'Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch now!
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Friday, March 29, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On