Editor responsible in cases of false reporting: SC | delhi | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Jan 19, 2017-Thursday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Editor responsible in cases of false reporting: SC

delhi Updated: Mar 11, 2013 21:25 IST
PTI
Highlight Story

The editor of a newspaper shall be responsible in any civil or criminal case filed against it for publishing false or offensive news report, the Supreme Court held on Monday.

A bench of justices C K Prasad and V G Gowda said that the editor controls the selection of the matter that is published and he cannot be exempted from proceedings on the ground that the alleged offensive news was published without taking his permission.

"From the scheme of the Press and Registration of Books Act, it is evident that it is the editor who controls the selection of the matter that is published in a newspaper. Further, every copy of the newspaper is required to contain the names of the owner and the editor and once the name of the editor is shown, he shall be held responsible in any civil and criminal proceeding," the bench said.

The court dismissed the plea of editor of Gujarati daily newspaper Sandesh who sought quashing of proceedings against him on the ground that he was not responsible for a publication of a defamatory news story in 1999 and decision to publish the story was taken by a resident editor.

"A news item has the potentiality of bringing doom’s day for an individual. The editor controls the selection of the matter that is published. Therefore, he has to keep a careful eye on the selection. Blue-penciling of news articles by any one other than the editor is not welcome in a democratic polity. Editors have to take responsibility of everything they publish and to maintain the integrity of published records," the bench said.

"It is apt to remind ourselves the answer of the editor of the Scotsman, a Scottish newspaper. When asked what it was like to run a national newspaper, the editor answered, 'run a newspaper! I run a country'. It may be an exaggeration but it does reflect the wellknown fact that it can cause far-reaching consequences in an individual and country’s life," the bench said.

<