Supreme Court scraps common medical entrance | delhi | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Jan 24, 2017-Tuesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

Supreme Court scraps common medical entrance

delhi Updated: Jul 19, 2013 01:22 IST
HT Correspondent
HT Correspondent
Hindustan Times
Highlight Story

The Supreme Court on Thursday quashed the Medical Council of India’s (MCI) notification about holding a common entrance test for admission to MBBS, BDS and post-graduate courses in all medical colleges. The judgment will pave the way for private colleges to hold their own entrance test.

In a majority 2-1 verdict, the SC held that the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) violated the rights of state and private institutions.

But Justice AR Dave, who disagreed with Chief Justice Altamas Kabir and Justice Vikramjit Sen, approved of the MCI’s plea that the MCI’s policy was “legal” and would put an end to the corrupt practice of undeserving students getting admission by paying huge capitation fees or making donations.

Reacting to the verdict, MCI counsel Nidhesh Gupta said, “The SC has virtually legalised capitation fee and profiteering because it suggests candidates with less merit can be taken in.”

Meanwhile, CJI Kabir was caught unawares when informed that an article by SC advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan — uploaded on a website two hours before the verdict — had leaked the judgment and even mentioned that Justice Dave’s would be the dissenting vote.

The article talked about “gossip” within court circles that the appeals by private colleges against the NEET would be allowed.

When questioned about the ‘leak’, Justice Kabir said he was surprised and shocked. “What can I say about it?” he said.

The outgoing CJI was on his way to his farewell party when media persons questioned him.

About the verdict, MCI counsel Nidhesh Gupta further added: “The judgment records that merit is not marks alone, and human sympathies are equally important. This means an educational institution can reject a candidate with higher marks and take a candidate with less marks if the latter conforms to its beliefs.”