India slams UN Security Council for ‘un-implementable’ peacekeeping mandates
India has strongly criticised a “fragmented” UN Security Council for coming up with “unwieldy” and “un-implementable” peacekeeping mandates that put the credibility of the UN and safety and security of peacekeepers at grave risk.india Updated: Oct 26, 2016 12:14 IST
India has strongly criticised a “fragmented” UN Security Council for coming up with “unwieldy” and “un-implementable” peacekeeping mandates that put the credibility of the UN and safety and security of peacekeepers at grave risk.
Speaking at a General Assembly debate on peacekeeping operations, India’s deputy permanent representative Tanmaya Lal said, “Peacekeeping, the signature activity of the UN, is under tremendous stress today.”
“The multiplicity of tasks and Christmas-tree mandates; a departure from well-established principles of impartiality; an avoidance of the primacy of politics; a focus on mere ‘band aid’ solutions through peacekeeping, and a near absolute lack of effective consultations among the Troop Contributing Countries (TCCs), Security Council and the secretariat are all part of the existential and philosophical dilemma facing the peacekeeping today,” Lal said.
He noted that under-secretary-general for peacekeeping operations, Herve Ladsous, talked about building new coalitions of support to address collective security challenges in today’s multipolar world.
“Perhaps this can and should start at home i.e. within the Security Council, which remains divided, even as it comes up with unwieldy and un-implementable mandates, putting both the credibility of the UN and the safety and security of peacekeepers at grave risk,” Lal said on Tuesday.
He said the manner in which peacekeeping mandates, are finalised clearly demonstrates that the problems have their origin at their source itself.
Lal cited the example of the recently renewed and “so far unimplemented” mandate for the UN mission in South Sudan.
He said even after three months of renewing the peacekeeping mandate in South Sudan, the situation on the ground, including for the peacekeepers, is no better.
Lal strongly criticised the Security Council for not listening to the Troop Contributing Countries regarding the mandate but also failing to secure the consent of the host government for the revision of the mandate.
“Further, seeing the way the mandate renewal resolution was adopted, it appears that there was no consensus even among the P-5,” he said, referring to the five permanent members of the Council.
Lal said the United Nations Mission in South Sudan mandate came out of a “fragmented Security Council, with little or no groundwork of crucial political work especially with the host government, with little agreement within the UNSC itself, and with no effective consultations with the TCCs who, in the end, have to implement this mandate.”
“Is it any wonder why we are in the situation we are in,” Lal said.
He said the primary purpose of peacekeeping operations is to prevent conflicts areas and their relapse in areas emerging from long-drawn conflicts but despite member states having highlighted this repeatedly, many peacekeeping operations today are continuing to operate in a “vacuum of political negotiations”.