SC rejects claim that December 16 victim was not violated with iron rod | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

SC rejects claim that December 16 victim was not violated with iron rod

Hindustan Times | BySatya Prakash, New Delhi
Jul 29, 2016 11:37 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected defence counsel ML Sharma’s claim that the December 16 gang rape victim was not violated with an iron rod, saying it can’t be raised at the stage of appeal.

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected defence counsel ML Sharma’s claim that the December 16 gang rape victim was not violated with an iron rod, saying it can’t be raised at the stage of appeal.

The SC had on April 4 began final hearing the convicts’ appeal almost two years after staying their execution.(HT file)
The SC had on April 4 began final hearing the convicts’ appeal almost two years after staying their execution.(HT file)

“Why didn’t you raise it during the trial? It’s nowhere on the record. You can’t argue about something which is not there on record,” a three-judge bench headed by justice Dipak Misra told Sharma – who is representing convicts Mukesh and Pawan Gupta.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

The defence counsel contended that it wasn’t medically possible that the victim’s intestine was pulled out without damaging her uterus, if an iron rod was repeatedly inserted. Post-mortem report prepared by the Singapore hospital where she died during treatment stated that her uterus and ovaries were intact, Sharma contended.

He also sought to debunk the rod insertion theory of the prosecution, saying the DNA report of the victim’s blood sample taken from the bus can’t match from that taken on the morning of December 17, 2012 as she had been given three units of blood. Citing a US case, he said DNA of a patient changes after being administered someone else’s blood.

Read: Exclusive: In Delhi, a rape accused has 83% chance of acquittal

But the bench rejected his argument, saying, “We are not experts on DNA. It’s not part of the record. You should have raised it during the trial.”

Objecting to Sharma’s claims, senior counsel Siddharth Luthra, representing the prosecution, asked why the prosecution witnesses were not recalled.

Sharma said he had raised it before the Delhi high court.

The bench asked Sharma to finish his arguments on Monday when the hearing would resume.

Read: Family, police pressure: Why most rape victims turn hostile during trial

Besides Mukesh and Pawan, two other convicts are Vinay Sharma and Akshay Thakur. They were been given death penalty by the trial court in September 2013 for raping a 23-year-old paramedic in Delhi on December 16, 2012, leading to her death few days later in Singapore.

Six months later, the Delhi high court upheld their conviction and sentence. All the convicts moved the SC in 2014, which stayed their execution.

Six persons, including a juvenile had assaulted the woman in a moving bus in south Delhi. Later, the accused threw out the victim and her male friend at an isolated spot. She died in a Singapore hospital on December 29, 2012, triggering nationwide protests.

The SC had on April 4 began final hearing the convicts’ appeal almost two years after staying their execution.

Read: Only 12% of those charged with raping children convicted in Delhi

Unveiling 'Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch Now!

Get Current Updates on India News, PM Narendra Modi Live, Farmers Protest Live Updates along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Thursday, March 07, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On