Why privacy clause in Aadhaar law if it’s not fundamental right: SC grills UIDAI | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

Why privacy clause in Aadhaar law if it’s not fundamental right: SC grills UIDAI

Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Jul 28, 2017 12:06 AM IST

The Supreme Court said one whole chapter in the Aadhaar Act deals with privacy interest, and wanted to know if it was not another legitimate recognition of privacy being a fundamental right.

The nine-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court hearing the privacy case asked the UIDAI on Thursday to explain how a chapter was dedicated to privacy in the Aadhaar law if it was not a fundamental right.

The Supreme Court expressed concern over Aadhaar, which the government says is a tool to provide social welfare measures to the millions of poor in the country without any leakages.(PTI File Photo / Representational)
The Supreme Court expressed concern over Aadhaar, which the government says is a tool to provide social welfare measures to the millions of poor in the country without any leakages.(PTI File Photo / Representational)

Justice RF Nariman, a member of the bench led by Chief Justice JS Khehar, posed the question to additional solicitor general Tushar Mehta who said he would place the authority’s stand before the court on August 1, the next date of hearing in the matter.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

“A one whole chapter in the Aadhaar Act deals with privacy interest. Is this not another legitimate recognition of it (privacy) being a fundamental right?” Justice Nariman inquired from Mehta.

On his part, the law officer submitted that privacy and confidentiality were non-negotiable. “There is no question of a compromise here,” Mehta assured, saying he would place his arguments on the next date.

During the day-long hearing, the bench expressed concern over Aadhaar, which the government says is a tool to provide social welfare measures to the millions of poor in the country without any leakages.

Justice DY Chandrachud reminded Attorney General KK Venugopal that the petitioners challenging Aadhaar have not questioned the objective but raised fear of data breach.

“Nobody claims it is not a social justice welfare scheme. What they are worried about is that whether information given to the agencies will be safe and for that do you have a robust law. And if you don’t then you must have one,” Justice Chandrachud told the law officer.

The judge’s remark came as Venugopal reiterated the government stand that privacy was multifaceted and every facet of it cannot be considered a fundamental right.

“Informational privacy cannot be claimed in a situation where fundamental right of others will be defeated,” he told the bench. While the Centre concluded its arguments on the privacy issue, the Maharashtra government took off from where the attorney general left.

It submitted that privacy is not a fundamental right and the Supreme Court should refrain from injecting it into the constitution.

Senior advocate A Sundaram, representing the Maharashtra government, told the court that “Privacy can mean a lot of things. Moreover, right to privacy was considered by the Constitution makers but they decided to drop it as a fundamental right.”

Unveiling 'Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch now!

Get Current Updates on India News, Lok Sabha Election 2024 LIVE along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On