First politburo’s last member
Jyoti Basu was the last of the founder-politburo members of the Communist Party of India (Marxist). He was part of the so-called “gang of nine” senior leaders who walked out of the undivided Communist Party of India (CPI) to form the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in 1964, write Avijit Ghosal & Tanmay Chatterjee.india Updated: Jan 18, 2010 01:06 IST
Jyoti Basu was the last of the founder-politburo members of the Communist Party of India (Marxist).
He was part of the so-called “gang of nine” senior leaders who walked out of the undivided Communist Party of India (CPI) to form the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in 1964.
If Basu, always a pragmatist, was disappointed at not being anointed party chief then or later, he didn’t show it. But over the next four decades, he emerged as India’s tallest communist leader and a much respected elder statesman, whose counsel was sought by friend and foe alike. Little wonder he became his party’s chief trouble-shooter.
Basu, a dour and no-nonsense political leader, was known to be charming in his personal life. He counted former prime ministers Indira Gandhi and Atal Bihari Vajpayee, both sworn political enemies, as his personal friends.
Even Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee, arguably the Left’s Enemy No. 1, is an ardent admirer.
But despite his larger-than-life image and his vice-like grip over West Bengal, Basu could never really establish his writ over his party nationally.
This became evident in 1996 when the CPI(M) politburo vetoed, reportedly by one vote, his chances of becoming the country’s first communist prime minister. Later, Basu called it a “historic blunder”, but never explained what he meant or who he thought had committed that blunder.
His record as the country’s longest serving chief minister is patchy. He presided over a state that became, in his own words, “an industrial desert”.
He did nothing to stop his party commissars from turning the state’s bureaucracy, its police force and its many centres of higher education into instruments of political patronage.
Then, there were allegations that his son had built a business empire on the basis of his clout. Nothing, however, was ever proved.
But the first half of his reign also brought unprecedented prosperity to rural Bengal courtesy a programme to faithfully implement land reforms that made tillers the owners of the land they farmed.
The benefits of that programme Basu’s crowning glory – are now wearing thin. The next logical step – planned industrialisation – will remain his biggest failure.
Retired bureaucrats say Basu was an able administrator who understood the need of the hour. His critics feel he used his leadership qualities to maintain the status quo.
The truth probably lies somewhere in between.