Friends, foes criticise Kanhaiya for Gujarat, 1984 riots comments | india | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Sep 24, 2017-Sunday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Friends, foes criticise Kanhaiya for Gujarat, 1984 riots comments

JNU students’ union president Kanhaiya Kumar was criticised on Tuesday for his remarks that 1984 anti-Sikh riot was a “mob-led massacre” while 2002 Gujarat riots were a “state sponsored violence.”

india Updated: Mar 30, 2016 00:44 IST
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students’ union   president Kanhaiya Kumar during a press conference in Hyderabad last week.
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students’ union president Kanhaiya Kumar during a press conference in Hyderabad last week.(AFP)

JNU students’ union president Kanhaiya Kumar was criticised on Tuesday for his remarks that 1984 anti-Sikh riot was a “mob-led massacre” while 2002 Gujarat riots were a “state sponsored violence.”

Kanhaiya’s comments did not go down well even with those who have been his zealous supporters ever since he was arrested in a sedition case over an event against hanging of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru. Anti-national slogans were allegedly raised during the incident.

“Sorry Kanhaiya, you’re badly wrong here. The 1984 anti-Sikh pogrom was just as much sponsored by state machinery,” CPI(ML) Politburo member and former JNUSU president Kavita Krishnan wrote on Twitter.

Sharing a report by People’s Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR) on 1984 anti-Sikh riots, Krishnan further said, “I hope @kanhaiyajnusu and all others read Who Are The Guilty, the report that documents the meticulous planning”.

Swaraj Abhiyan leader Yogendra Yadav, who is also an JNU alumni tweeted, “Sorry to disagree again @kanhaiyajnusu Both 2002,1984 were state sanctioned Emergency was closest we came to fascism”.

Speaking at an event at JNU on Monday, Kanhaiya said that there is a difference between 2002 riots and 1984 Sikh massacre as the Gujarat violence was “carried out through state machinery while the other was caused due to mob frenzy.”

He had also compared the alleged onslaught on varsities with Gujarat riots alleging both of them were carried out “with support” from state machinery even as he stressed that there is a fundamental difference between “emergency” and “fascism”.

However, following the criticism, Kanhaiya said that he has been “misinterpreted”.

“I have been misinterpreted and misrepresented yet again. There isn’t an iota of doubt that Emergency represents one of the darkest periods of Indian democracy. My organization AISF strongly opposed and fought against the state repression during Emergency. Both 1984 and 2002 were indeed state led pogroms for which justice is still awaited,” he said in a statement.

“The current central government is relentlessly carrying forward its fascist agenda using state power, as visible in the recent authoritarian actions against students and all voices of dissent across the country. What we now witness is unprecedented - a form of undeclared emergency,” he said.

JNU students’ union president Kanhaiya Kumar was criticised on Tuesday for his remarks that 1984 anti-Sikh riot was a “mob-led massacre” while 2002 Gujarat riots were a “state sponsored violence.”

Kanhaiya’s comments did not go down well even with those who have been his zealous supporters ever since he was arrested in a sedition case over an event against hanging of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru. Anti-national slogans were allegedly raised during the incident.

“Sorry Kanhaiya, you’re badly wrong here. The 1984 anti-Sikh pogrom was just as much sponsored by state machinery,” CPI(ML) Politburo member and former JNUSU President Kavita Krishnan wrote on Twitter.

Sharing a report by People’s Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR) on 1984 anti-Sikh riots, Krishnan further said, “I hope @kanhaiyajnusu and all others read Who Are The Guilty, the report that documents the meticulous planning”.

Swaraj Abhiyan leader Yogendra , who is also an JNU alumni tweeted, “Sorry to disagree again @kanhaiyajnusu Both 2002,1984 were state sanctioned Emergency was closest we came to fascism”.

Speaking at an event at JNU on Monday, Kanhaiya said that there is a difference between 2002 riots and 1984 Sikh massacre as the Gujarat violence was “carried out through state machinery while the other was caused due to mob frenzy.”

He had also compared the alleged onslaught on varsities with Gujarat riots alleging both of them were carried out “with support” from state machinery even as he stressed that there is a fundamental difference between “emergency” and “fascism”.

However, following the criticism, Kanhaiya said that he has been “misinterpreted”.

“I have been misinterpreted and misrepresented yet again. There isn’t an iota of doubt that Emergency represents one of the darkest periods of Indian democracy. My organization AISF strongly opposed and fought against the state repression during Emergency. Both 1984 and 2002 were indeed state led pogroms for which justice is still awaited,” he said in a statement.

“The current central government is relentlessly carrying forward its fascist agenda using state power, as visible in the recent authoritarian actions against students and all voices of dissent across the country. What we now witness is unprecedented - a form of undeclared emergency,” he said.