Playing action video games trains people to make the right decisions faster, according to scientists.
Researchers from the University of Rochester found that video game players develop a heightened sensitivity to what is going on around them, and this benefit doesn''t just make them better at playing video games, but improves a wide variety of general skills that can help with everyday activities like multitasking, driving, reading small print, keeping track of friends in a crowd, and navigating around town.
Authors Daphne Bavelier, Alexandre Pouget, and C. Shawn Green report that video games could provide a potent training regimen for speeding up reactions in many types of real-life situations.
The researchers tested dozens of 18- to 25-year-olds who were not ordinarily video game players. They split the subjects into two groups. One group played 50 hours of the fast-paced action video games 'Call of Duty 2' and 'Unreal Tournament,' and the other group played 50 hours of the slow-moving strategy game 'The Sims 2.'
After this training period, all of the subjects were asked to make quick decisions in several tasks designed by the researchers.
In the tasks, the participants had to look at a screen, analyze what was going on, and answer a simple question about the action in as little time as possible (i.e. whether a clump of erratically moving dots was migrating right or left across the screen on average).
In order to make sure the effect wasn''t limited to just visual perception, the participants were also asked to complete an analogous task that was purely auditory.
The action game players were up to 25 percent faster at coming to a conclusion and answered just as many questions correctly as their strategy game playing peers.
"It''s not the case that the action game players are trigger-happy and less accurate: They are just as accurate and also faster," Bavelier said. "Action game players make more correct decisions per unit time. If you are a surgeon or you are in the middle of a battlefield, that can make all the difference."
The study appears in the journal Current Biology.