Image warnings on cigarette packs go up in smoke
Pictorial warnings on cigarette packs and other tobacco products are largely ineffective and don’t convey ill-effects of tobacco consumption, a study has found. HT Correspondent reports.india Updated: Nov 05, 2009 13:01 IST
Pictorial warnings on cigarette packs and other tobacco products are largely ineffective and don’t convey ill effects of tobacco consumption, a study has found.
Researchers from the non-governmental organisation, Healis Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, interviewed 615 people, including 136 smokers, across the city in September.
It was found that many of them made bizarre interpretations of the pictures the government had made mandatory in May this year to discourage tobacco consumption.
Many took the scorpion’s image represented a zodiac sign and a picture of diseased lungs was mistaken to be that of burnt leaves.
Over 50 per cent of respondents did not realise that the image of the x-ray of lungs was meant to show ill effects of smoking.
“They made unscientific connections of the picture and thought that it was a waterfall between mountains or a butterfly,” said Healis director Dr PC Gupta.
Over 25 per cent of those surveyed felt that these images did not stop anybody from using tobacco products and over 49 per cent said that pictures showing mouth cancer and a diseased human face, which were originally proposed by the government, would have been more effective in conveying the message.
The findings have been submitted to the Health Ministry with a request to impose stronger pictorial warnings.
Healis had also purchased around 25 different tobacco products to see if warnings on them complied with a government notification under the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (prohibition of advertisements and regulation of trade and commerce, production and distribution) Act 2003.
It was found that most warnings occupied less than the 40 per cent of the pack as mandated.
Dr Gupta said the warnings needed to be in local languages so that more people understand them. “The law is ambiguous about the language of warning so most tobacco companies are getting away by using only English which some people don’t understand,” he said.