IT czar Azim Premji on Saturday said that one should cultivate a sense of insensitivity to be in politics. “Why am I not in politics? Because I think it would have killed me in a couple of years... you should cultivate a sense of insensitivity to be in politics,” said Premji.
The Wipro’s billionaire founder, who has given away almost half of his stake holding in the company to philanthropy, was responding to a question from the audience at the Indian Institute of Management’s first global alumni conclave and leadership summit ‘IIMBUE’.
On lack of skillful and talented people with philanthropic attitude in politics, he said, “One would definitely encourage talented people to join government and to join politics, the issue is do they have a mental make-up for it?”
“Certainly they should be encouraged. How do you raise the standard of politics and the standard of governance unless you manage with the right people,” said Premji, who was in conversation with Biocon head and chairperson of the board of governors-IIMB Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw on the topic ‘The business of philanthropy’.
Responding to a query on the challenges he encountered while giving away money for philanthropy, the business tycoon said, “I think the biggest challenge that we face is the size of the problem, the scope of the problem, the depth of the problem.”
Premji, whose company’s CSR arm, the Azim Premji Foundation, is already involved in primary education in backward areas among others, said that despite having large-scale projects the intended effect cannot be reached at micro-levels owing to dependency on executing agencies. “... you are just penetrating a small proportion of the whole scenario, of the problem. That is very frustrating because you just don’t have bandwidth. You may still have the money, you don’t have the bandwidth,” he said.
“Second thing is you do rely on government machinery in terms of the work we do, like education. We have to depend on them very significantly, but it is in the slowness of the change... ,” Premji added.
Asked for his thoughts on the 2% CSR mandate, he said, “in principle, I don’t like mandate. So, I would object to a 2% mandate, but now that’s made accompli, it has become a statutory law.”
“I think what is good is they have left it up to the governance committee of the company to decide the priority of usage of those funds, all one can wish for is that companies utilise those funds honestly and don’t substitute their own personal charity with company funds. Let us see how it works out... ,” he added.