Sanskrit to remain optional: Smriti Irani
Human Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani on Sunday dismissed allegations that education was being ‘saffronised’, even as she rejected demands that Sanskrit be made compulsory in the curriculum.india Updated: Nov 24, 2014 00:08 IST
Human Resource Development (HRD) Minister Smriti Irani on Sunday dismissed allegations that education was being ‘saffronised’, even as she rejected demands that Sanskrit be made compulsory in the curriculum.
“Those who accuse me of being a RSS mascot or RSS representative possibly want to deflect the attention from the good work that we have done. This agenda will be flagged and I will be whipped for as long as there is a need to keep attention diverted away from the good work. I am ready for it. I have no problem,” Irani told PTI journalists.
Answering questions on the controversial decision to replace German with Sanskrit as the third language in some 500 centrally-run Kendriya Vidyalayas, Irani said that teaching of German under an Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed in 2011 had been in violation of the Constitution. An investigation has already been launched to find out how the MoU came to be signed.
Responding to demands that Sanskrit be made a compulsory language, the minister said that the three-language formula was very clear that any of the 23 Indian languages listed in Schedule 8 of the Constitution could be opted for.
But she reiterated that German will continue to be taught as a foreign language.
“We are teaching French, we are teaching Mandarin, we teach German in the same way. I can't understand why people are not understanding what I am saying,” she said.
Irani had earlier strongly defended the decision to replace German with Sanskrit as the third language, saying the existing arrangement was in violation of the Constitution.
Dismissing charges that efforts were being made to “saffronise” education, the Minister said she has never tried to explain herself on the “basis of secularism with respect to saffronisation in terms of education” while citing examples of choosing heads of institutions irrespective of their religion.
(with agency inputs)