Soon, states may allow townships near sanctuaries | india | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Mar 28, 2017-Tuesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

Soon, states may allow townships near sanctuaries

india Updated: Sep 20, 2014 23:54 IST
Chetan Chauhan

In a boost to the real estate sector, the environment ministry may soon allow state governments to take a call on setting up new townships, information technology and developmental parks near tiger reserves, national parks, eco-sensitive zones and critically polluted areas.

The ministry has already issued draft rules proposing delegation of its power to decide on construction projects within 10 kms of wildlife areas and critically polluted areas to the state governments.

Till now, the Centre used to examine such projects to consider their impact on wildlife before giving a go-ahead. But now, the ministry has proposed the “general condition” for construction projects including information technology parks, hotels and offices will “not” apply.

The proposal, once notified, would mean that in the future, real estate projects such as the one coming up near the Okhla Bird Sanctuary in Delhi would require only the state government’s approval.

The Centre will have no role to play unlike in the Okhla case where the ministry was directed by the National Green Tribunal to earmark an eco-sensitive zone around the sanctuary. The ministry is proposing 100 sq meters as eco-sensitive zone.

Environment minister Prakash Javadekar has termed such moves as “cooperative federalism” of the Narendra Modi government saying, it would reduce the approval burden on his ministry by 90%.

Sunita Narian, director-general of Centre for Science and Environment, had questioned this, saying that the states do not have capacity to appraise the projects on environmental aspects.

The draft notification comes days after the ministry delinked forest and wildlife approvals meaning that a project within 10 sq km of a wildlife area can be approved by the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC) without being considered by the National Board for Wildlife.

The ministry had filled the board with retired experts from government institutions, leading to an outcry that “independent” wildlife experts were not there.