Tragedy exposes unpreparedness of navy to handle deep sea rescue

  • HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times, New Delhi
  • |
  • Updated: Aug 14, 2013 11:34 IST

The Sindhurakshak disaster has underlined the sad state of the Indian Navy’s rescue capabilities if a tragedy were to strike deep in the seas, a senior navy official told HT.

The navy doesn’t have any deep-submergence rescue vessels (DSRV) or submarine rescue chambers to save lives in the event of a disaster. Its efforts to procure submarine rescue equipment have yielded no results over the last 15 years.

“The tragedy has focused attention on the lack of submarine rescue equipment in the navy. It would have been an absolute disaster had the accident taken place 100 metres under water,” said former navy chief Admiral Arun Prakash.

When former President APJ Abdul Kalam went on a sortie on the INS Sindhurakshak in 2006, India had to request the US Navy to deploy its DSRVs and other rescue equipment in case something went wrong.

The Indian Navy does have an understanding with the US Navy to make use of their DSRVs to rescue submariners, but it may not be immediately available.

A DSRV can rescue 24 sailors at one go from an ocean, linking up with a wrecked submarine’s hatch.

The two navies had conducted a joint exercise last year — INDIAEX-2012 — to “rescue” submariners trapped under the sea. The navy, currently, only has basic underwater rescue facilities.

Navy officials said in case of a disaster during a patrol thousands of miles away from home shores, the crew members would only have pressurised escape suits to count on.  “Even these pressurised suits are helpful only if the submarine is at a certain depth. If it’s deep down below, they are ineffective,” a navy official said.

The navy could carry out rescue with the help of diving support vessels such as INS Nireekshak, but again there are limitations if rescue has to be carried out below a certain depth.

 

also read

Union budget 2015: Delhi Metro funds allocation hiked by 22%

blog comments powered by Disqus