Irfan Pathan will share the pace bowling load with Vinay, Praveen Kumar and Ashok Dinda. (Reuters)
The sight of India’s batsmen No 3 and 5, Kohli and Raina, bowling the last two overs of a One-day innings in the CB Series in Australia was rather disturbing. One could understand, had they been summoned in the second innings after the match was virtually won.
But throwing the ball to them in the first innings of the match and that too when the Sri Lankan batsmen had already scored plenty was a cause of worry. What made it worse was the fact that the India skipper hadn’t miscalculated the overs, for the regular bowlers still had a few in the kitty. So, the only logical reasoning behind such a move had to be the lack of faith in the frontline bowlers.
But, you wouldn’t blame the captain, after all. Our bowlers had leaked far too many runs in the final overs in all the preceding matches. The gamble of trying Raina and Kohli was radical indeed but not bereft of logic.
Post the World Cup-victory, India have lost much of their bowling resources. It’s about time we realise that winning a match or tournament isn’t possible with batting alone. While we dissected our dismal showings in England and Australia, our analysis stopped with the batting failure. Little did we realise that our less-than-potent bowling attack ought to be blamed equally. If we continue to allow the opposition, even on helpful surfaces, to manage above-par scores consistently, then the expectations from the Indian batting will only become unrealistic.
While Dhoni insists he’s got enough bowling talent at his disposal, and that the faux pas happens only during execution, it seems too naïve a view. The level of execution rates how good a talent is. A bowler may possess the talent of bowling immaculate yorkers and well-disguised slower-ones, but if he fails to execute them perfectly when it’s needed, then it’s futile.
India’s bowling woes are two-fold — a) There’s an obvious paucity of bowlers who can bowl in the powerplay and death overs and, b) Our bowlers seem to lack the teeth to take wickets. Ashwin is the only bowler who seems to be capable of bowling in the powerplay overs but to expect an off-spinner bowl in the death overs is a little ambitious.
Also, most of our bowlers average over 40 runs for a wicket, which means that our bowling unit would concede over 400 runs to get 10 wickets. No wonder, we aren’t bowling the sides out that often. These are worrying statistics.
If we don’t have the quality then we may have to settle for quantity. Whenever we are playing in placid sub-continental surfaces, instead of playing an extra batsman, it’s better to play a specialist bowler as the fifth option. It’s relatively easier to chase 275 with 6 batsmen than chasing 340 with 7 batsmen.
Playing allrounders is always tempting but if one of their skill-set, which is batting in this case, is not utilised, it’s better to play an additional bowler.
The writer is a former India opener and plays domestic cricket for Rajasthan