Current Findings :
April 24 - May 1, 2002    

  Dear surfer,
This is a sequel to last year's public probe that HindustanTimes.com launched to unravel the mystery of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's disappearance in 1945.
Though the 2001 probe concluded beyond reasonable doubt that the leader had not died in the plane crash, no answer could be found to surfers' question on his fate beyond August 18, 1945. more...
Subhas Bose Probe: Phase I
These are findings of the first-ever public probe on Internet. Besides indictating that Subhas Bose did not die in the air crash on August 18, 1945, they also throw up pointers to the conspiracies that dogged the great leader during the dying days of World War II.
 
Secret and sensitive documents from Indian and foreign intelligence offices throw fierce light on cases relating to Netaji's disappearance.
 
Accounts of witnesses who deposed before the three panels instituted at various stages to unravel the Netaji mystery. .
 
Point of Contention
The Plot of Death
'Leave Bose alone'
  Shah Nawaz Report
G D Khosla Report
Foreign files tell all
  Mukherjee panel
  Why this probe?
His Vision
  His Struggle
  His Speeches
  His Letters
  His Books
  His Life & Times
  Indian National Army
  The Air-crash
  1931 - 1950
  1951 - 1980
  1981 - 2000
  India in World War II
  Indian National Army in East Asia
   
You are here: Home > Netaji Home

Handwriting test
Expert says writings match

By Anuj Dhar

B Lal, the expert appointed by HindustanTimes.com to match Bhagwanji's and Netaji's handwritings, has concluded that they are of "common authorship".

Among other things, Lal says:

There is "no evidence to show that the questioned (Bhagwanji's) writing has been made by a writer other than SCB (Subhas Chandra Bose) by imitating/copying the writings of SCB".
Bhagwanji tried to hide his identity but failed.
There are "…similarities in general and individual writing habits, …suggesting common authorship of questioned writings and admitted writings of SCB".

While pointing to the lack of muscular control, sign of old age and slight tremor in some of the writings, Lal also observes "a reproduction of some peculiarities that even decades could not hide". As examples, he points to the habit, both of Bhagwanji and Netaji, of using insertion marks to introduce words between sentences, over writing on letters and underlining and bracketing passages for emphasis, making strokes more prominent and writing letters in a certain combination.

Indeed, matching the samples was no easy task. Most of Bhagwanji's handwriting samples were notes left on the margins of pages. Also, most of the writing samples belonged to the '70s and '80s, whereas the samples of Netaji's writing were of pre-1943 years. To complicate matters, Bhagwanji had also written in upper case to disguise his hand.

Lal has 44 years of experience studying and analysing documents, both for the government and for private groups. Before retiring as Additional Director of National Institute of Criminology and Forensic Sciences, he was the Chief Government Examiner in Questioned Documents. (Lal will defend his report, if the Mukherjee Commission so demands.)

Handwriting analysis is admissible evidence in courts nowadays, and is as significant as fingerprint analysis. In fact, Mukherjee Commission visited Faizabad treasury on November 26, 2001, to collect samples for DNA and handwriting tests from Bhagwanji's belongings preserved there. (The samples may reach the Commission's Kolkata office in early May.)

 
  Related Stories
Gaps closing fast
'Bhagwanji's belongings
Govt fears disclosures
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Send your feedback at feedback@hindustantimes.com
Hindustan Times House, 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110001, India
Phone[Board]91-11-3361234
©Hindustan Times Ltd. 1997. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. For reprinting rights, please write to us
For Online Advertisement Queries mail to salil@hindustantimes.com