|
Let us first examine the political differences between Nehru
and Bose, and see if there is evidence of any hostility or
animus on the part of Nehru towards Bose. The Counsel for
the Commission read extracts from a bunch of old letters by
Jawaharlal Nehru, the authenticity of the contents of which
was not challenged by anyone.
These letters show that there were, no doubt, political differences
between Bose and Nehru, and whereas Nehru was a more moderate
politician, Bose was inclined to be more revolutionary and
more impetuous. But we find no evidence whatsoever of any
hostility, recrimination or vindictiveness on the part of
Nehru.
Indeed, before the unpleasantness caused by the presidential
election of 1939, Bose had written to Nehru in the most affectionate
and respectful terms. He wrote on March 4,1936: "I shall
make the statement as short as possible and say clearly that
I have definitely decided to give you my full support. Among
the front rank leaders of today, you are the only one to whom
we can look up to 'for leading the Congress in a progressive
direction." Again, on 13th March, 1936, he wrote to Nehru:
"I can think of no one else in whom I could have greater
confidence."
Writing on June 13,1936, he expressed concern about Nehru's
health, saying, "from the papers I gathered that you
were over-working yourself and I was feeling concerned about
your health. I am glad that you went to Mussoorie for a rest,
though a short one. I can appreciate how difficult it is for
you to avoid over-working yourself; nevertheless, I do hope
that you will not strain yourself too much.
It will not help anyone if you have a break down." Again
on October 19,1938, Bose writing to Nehru said, "you
cannot imagine how I have missed you all these months. I realize,
of course, that you needed a change very badly. I am only
sorry that you did not give yourself enough physical rest.
A.K.Chanda, writing on the eve of the presidential election
on November 28, 1938, said to Nehru: "And if he (Gandhiji)met
you now, he would, in all probability, seek your help in anger,
regretting that differences had arisen in the National Congress.
He said : "As I told you, your contest in the election
has done some good and some harm. I recognize the good, but
I am apprehensive of the harm that will follow. I still think
that, in the balance, it would have been better if this particular
conflict had not taken place in this way. But that is a thing
of the past and we have to face the future."
Bose, however, appears to have taken the differences as a
personal affront to his dignity and position. He did not reply
to the long letter written by Nehru from which the above passage
has been quoted, and later, Nehru wrote to his brother, Sarat
Chandra Bose, in reply to a letter which the latter had sent,
"but your letter hardly refers to any question of policy
or programme. It deals with personal issues and brings serious
charges against particular individuals. "
I do not
know how far your letter represents Subhas's views on the
subject
I think it is desirable to have some kind of
investigation into the various charges brought by you or others.
It is improper that such charges should be made vaguely, and
the fact that many people believe in them does not substantiate
them. We cannot allow our public life to descend to a level
of mutual recrimination
, I had hoped that it would be
possible in these days of internal and external crisis to
have a large measure of cooperation among Congress men, and
laboured to this end at Tripuri and before
if there is
to be conflict among Congress men, I earnestly hope that it
will be kept on a higher level and will be confined to matters
of policy and principle."
In these letters there is not the slightest sign of hostility
or antipathy. There is an expression of regret on the part
of Nehru for the differences in a national organization. There
is anxiety to avoid a split and a spirit of what may be called
sweet reasonableness.
It has often been said about Nehru that he never entertained
any venom or feelings of recrimination, and that although
he was imprisoned a number of times by the British Government,
he found it in his heart to be friendly towards the British
after independence. It was the system he fought against and
not the individuals who were no more than instruments through
whom the system was administered.
|
|