SC upholds jail term of Chautala, son in teachers’ recruitment scam | punjab | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Feb 28, 2017-Tuesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

SC upholds jail term of Chautala, son in teachers’ recruitment scam

punjab Updated: Aug 03, 2015 17:41 IST
Om Prakash Chautala

Om Prakash Chautala, former chief-minister of Haryana (HT Photo)

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the plea of former Haryana chief minister Om Prakash Chautala and others, challenging their conviction and award of 10-year jail term for the teachers’ recruitment scam.

“We are not inclined to entertain any of these appeals and they are dismissed,” a bench of justice FMI Kalifulla and justice Shiva Kirti Singh said.

Besides 80-year-old Chautala’s appeal, the bench also dismissed the plea of his son Ajay Singh Chautala, 54, and others in the case saying that the Delhi high court verdict was a “reasoned one”.

The court, however, said that the convicts may move the high court with their pleas seeking relief like parole on health ground.

Chautala, his son and three others are serving a 10-year jail term in the case.

A Supreme Court judge had on July 6 recused himself from hearing Chautala’s plea, saying he had appeared for some of the convicts in the case.

The high court had on March 5 upheld the jail term awarded to Chautala, his son Ajay and three others, saying, “The overwhelming evidence showed the shocking and spine-chilling state of affairs in the country”.

The father-son duo and 53 others, including two IAS officers, were convicted on January 16, 2013, by the trial court for illegally recruiting 3,206 junior basic trained (JBT) teachers in Haryana in 2000.

Besides Chautalas and whistleblower IAS officer Sanjiv Kumar, the then director of primary education, the high court had also awarded 10-year prison term to IAS officer Vidya Dhar, then officer on special duty (OSD) to the chief minister, and Sher Singh Badshami, then MLA and political adviser to Chautala senior.

All 55 convicts have been sentenced under Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 418 (cheating), 467 (forgery), 471 (using forged documents as genuine) of IPC and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The high court had modified the trial court’s order on the quantum of sentence and awarded two-year jail term to 50 other convicts.

Initially, there were 62 accused in the case. While two died before filing of the chargesheet, four died during the trial of the case and one was discharged by the trial court.