A new research has found that men are less likely to agree with scientific evidence of gender bias in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines than women.
Previous research had revealed that gender biases limit the opportunities for women within STEM disciplines.
"It is critical to understand how people react to evidence of bias in order to implement successful interventions designed to decrease it, particularly given mounting evidence that non-stigmatised group members (white men) may respond differently than other individuals," the authors noted.
For the study, researchers Corinne Moss-Racusin, Aneta Molenda and Charlotte Cramer analysed 831 public comments made on three online news articles from the New York Times, Discover Magazine Blog and the IFL Science blog.
They found that men were more likely to respond negatively to these articles than women.
"Only 9.5% of the comments argued that sexism does not exist and 68% of these commenters were men," the authors said.
While 67.4% of the comments agreed that gender bias exists, of these 29% were men.
The findings showed that 22% of all of the comments justified the existence of gender bias. Of these comments, between 79% and 88% were made by men.
It also found that 59.8% justified gender bias using biological explanations, 29.6% used non-biological explanations and 10.6% justified gender bias, stating that women perpetrate it by discriminating against other women.
Almost 100% of the comments expressing gratitude for the study were made by women.
The researchers also studied sexist remarks made by men and women in the comments.
"Seven% of all of the comments included sexist remarks. Of these, 76.8% were against women and 23.2% were against men," they found.
Of the sexist remarks made against women, 95% were made by men, concluded the study that appeared in the journal Psychology of Women Quarterly.