Advertisement

HindustanTimes Wed,19 Jun 2013
RssFeed

Business Computing

Advertisement
Instagram asks court to throw out lawsuit over service terms
Reuters
February 14, 2013
First Published: 14:22 IST(14/2/2013)
Last Updated: 14:26 IST(14/2/2013)
Share more.
 comments   
Facebook's Instagram photo sharing service asked a federal court on Wednesday to throw out a lawsuit filed against the popular app over changes to its terms of service.
The proposed class action lawsuit was filed in San Francisco in December by an Instagram user who leveled breach of
contract and other claims against the service.

Instagram last year rolled out and then amended policy changes that incensed users who feared the photo-sharing service would use their pictures without compensation.

In Wednesday's filing, Instagram argues that the plaintiff, Lucy Funes, has no right to bring her claim because she could have deleted her Instagram account before the changes in the term of service went into effect.

The changes in the terms of service were first announced on December 17 and then altered a few days later following widespread user complaints.

Funes sued the company on December 21, nearly a month before the changes in the terms of service went into effect on January 19, the court papers said.

She continued to use her account after that day, according to Instagram's filing.

Instagram also disputed Funes' claims that the new terms required her to transfer rights in her photos to the company.

Both the old service terms and the new ones "emphasize that <the plaintiff> owns the content she posts through Instagram's service," the filing said.

An attorney for the plaintiff was not immediately available for comment. Facebook declined to comment.

In announcing the revised terms of service in December, Instagram also announced a mandatory arbitration clause, forcing users to waive their rights to participate in a class action lawsuit except under very limited circumstances.

Following user backlash, Instagram founder and CEO Kevin Systrom retreated partially, deleting language about displaying photos without compensation.

However, Instagram kept language that gave it the ability to place ads in conjunction with user content, saying "that we may not always identify paid services, sponsored content, or commercial communications as such." It also kept the mandatory arbitration clause.

Instagram, which allows people to add filters and effects to photos and share them easily on the Internet, was acquired by Facebook in 2012 for $715 million.

The civil lawsuit in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is Lucy Funes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. Instagram Inc.


Share more.
 comments   

comment Note: By posting your comments here you agree to the terms and conditions of www.hindustantimes.com
blog comments powered by Disqus

Advertisement
YouTube says the battle with TV is already over
In a flashy presentation to advertisers Wednesday night, Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt declined to forecast that Internet video will displace television watching.
Skylanders: Cloud Patrol arrives on App Store
The incentive to build up a collection of Skylanders toys is as integral as ever -- players plop in a figure's code to see it unlock as an additional character within the iPhone or iPad game.
more »
How Flipkart broke India's online shopping inertia
It was meant to be a portal that compared different e-commerce websites, only there weren't enough of them in the first place to be compared. Thus was born Flipkart, making sure that online shopping would never be the same again in India.
70 pc students use smartphones
About 70 per cent students today own smartphones with a larger user base in smaller cities than the metropolitan cities, according to a survey by software services firm TCS.
more »
Advertisement
Advertisement
Copyright © 2013 HT Media Limited. All Rights Reserved