Why have you held Hafiz Saeed without trial, court asks Pak’s Punjab govt
The Lahore high court said an Indian movie portrayed Hafiz Saeed as a villain, and the government should see if there is any international conspiracy against Pakistani citizens.world Updated: Apr 07, 2017 21:33 IST
The Lahore high court in Pakistan has asked the Punjab government to explain under what authority it has detained Jamaat-ud-Dawah chief Hafiz Saeed “without a trial”.
A two-judge bench headed by Justice Syed Kazim Raza Shamsi was on Monday hearing a petition of Saeed and his aides -- Prof Malik Zafar Iqbal, Abdur Rehman Abid, Qazi Kashif Hussain and Abdullah Ubaid -- who challenged their detention under the anti-terrorism law.
After hearing the arguments of advocate AK Dogar, counsel for Saeed, Justice Shamsi observed that the government should tell about its powers to detain a citizen like Saeed without trial.
Referring to an Indian movie wherein Saeed was portrayed as a villain, the judge said the government should see if there is any “international conspiracy” against Pakistani citizens.
Dogar concluded his arguments saying the government detained the JuD leaders without any justification.
He also questioned the powers of the provincial government to include any citizen in the fourth schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act. He said such powers were solely vested with the federal government.
He said the government had detained Saeed and others to please India and the US.
He further argued that the UN resolution followed by the government action did not seek detention of any citizen. He said the detention of the JuD leaders is a case of mala fide intention and ulterior motive on part of the government.
Dogar said the government had no evidence that the petitioners were a risk to security of Pakistan, and merely on the basis of UN resolutions their liberty could not be curtailed.
The government on January 30 had put Saeed and the four leaders of JuD and Falah-e-Insaniat (FIF) under house arrest in Lahore under the country’s anti-terrorism act.
The court adjourned the hearing till April 4.