'Aiding the enemy' charge stays against Manning in Wikileaks disclosure case | world | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Mar 24, 2017-Friday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

'Aiding the enemy' charge stays against Manning in Wikileaks disclosure case

world Updated: Jul 20, 2013 01:47 IST
Bradley Manning wikileaks case

A military judge refused to dismiss the most serious charge against US soldier Bradley Manning - aiding the enemy - over his giving thousands of pages of classified information to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.

The charge is punishable by up to life in prison without parole. The judge denied defense motions to acquit him of that charge and a computer fraud charge, saying the government had presented some evidence to support both charges.

Manning showed no reaction to the rulings. The trial is moving toward closing arguments, possibly next week.

To convict him of aiding the enemy, the government must prove Manning gave WikiLeaks intelligence with "evil intent" and "actual knowledge" that what he leaked would be seen by al-Qaida members.

Bradley Manning pleads guilty in WikiLeaks case, faces 20 years

Evidence suggests Manning leaked sensitive names

Attorney: Manning was naive, but good-intentioned

Prosecutors produced evidence that al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden obtained digital copies of some of the leaked documents WikiLeaks published.

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted to a security vehicle outside a courthouse in Fort Meade after a court martial hearing. (AP Photo)

The judge said prosecutors also produced evidence that Manning knew from his training and other military documents, that "it must be presumed foreign adversaries will view" anything posted on the WikiLeaks website.

The government also charged Manning with espionage and theft.

He was troubled over plight of Iraqis: witness

Manning says he leaked secrets to spark war debate

Manning said video would cause splash: aunt

Manning has said he leaked the material to provoke public discussion about what he considered wrongdoing by US troops and diplomats.

The material included video of a 2007 US Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed 11 men, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver.

A military investigation concluded the troops reasonably mistook the photography equipment for weapons.

Critics said the judge's refusal to drop the charges is a blow to whistleblowers.

"The government is equating all leakers with traitors, and they're not," Boston College Law School professor Mary-Rose Papandrea said in a written statement.

"There are very important differences between those who send information to the enemy with the intent of aiding the enemy and those people who release information to the public with the intent of informing the public debate."

Amnesty International called the charge of aiding the enemy "ludicrous" and said it should be withdrawn.

Manning is charged with 22 counts. He has pleaded guilty to reduced versions of nine espionage and computer fraud counts, essentially admitting violations of less-serious military laws, and to a military infraction prohibiting wrongful storage of classified information.

He faces up to 20 years in prison for those offenses.

Prosecutors accepted one of those pleas, involving a computer fraud charge, but are still trying to convict him of the original charges on the other counts.


Manning chose to be tried by a judge, rather than a jury.

Assange condemns 'show trial' of US soldier

Artists, activists unite to support Bradley Manning at Fort Meade

Leaked: Secret testimony of US private in WikiLeaks case

Meanwhile, Manning has received massive support on social media websites Facebook and Twitter. Several pages going by the names 'Save Bradley Manning' and 'Free Bradley have received support on Facebook.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/7/manning3.jpg http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2013/7/manning2.jpg

Twitter-ites too have tweeted using hashtags like #Manning to show their support for the soldier accused of leaking sensitive information to Wikileaks.