At UN, Muslim world questions Western freedom of speech | world | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Dec 06, 2016-Tuesday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

At UN, Muslim world questions Western freedom of speech

world Updated: Sep 30, 2012 14:53 IST

Agencies
Highlight Story

Muslim leaders were in unison at the United Nations this week arguing that the West was hiding behind its defense of freedom of speech and ignoring cultural sensitivities in the aftermath of anti-Islam slurs that have raised fears of a widening East-West cultural divide.

A video made in California depicting the Prophet Mohammad sparked the storming of US and other Western embassies in many Islamic countries and a deadly suicide bombing in Afghanistan in August.

The crisis deepened when a French magazine published caricatures of the Prophet.

Turkish FM Ahmet Davutoglu speaks during a joint press conference in Cairo. AFP/Files

Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu said it was time to put an end to the protection of Islamophobia masquerading as the freedom to speak freely.

"Unfortunately, Islamophobia has also become a new form of racism like anti-Semitism. It can no longer be tolerated under the guise of freedom of expression. Freedom does not mean anarchy," he told the 193-nation UN General Assembly on Friday.

Egypt's newly elected Islamist president, Mohamed Mursi , voiced similar sentiments in his speech on Wednesday.

"Egypt respects freedom of expression, freedom of expression that is not used to incite hatred against anyone," he said.

"We expect from others, as they expect from us, that they respect our cultural specifics and religious references, and not impose concepts or cultures that are unacceptable to us."

Mursi was one of the first leaders to be democratically elected after Arab Spring revolutions that led to changes in the governments of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen in 2011.

Western states that backed the uprisings have urged these countries to quickly foster democratic reforms and adhere stringently to human rights principles and basic freedoms.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2012/9/13_09_pg1a.jpg

They fear a more austere version of Islam could hijack the protest movements. Most Western speakers at the United Nation defended freedom of speech, but shied away from calls by Muslim leaders for an international ban on blasphemy.

While repeating his condemnations of the video, US President Barack Obama staunchly defended free speech, riling some of those leaders.

"The strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech - the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy," Obama said in a 30-minute speech dominated by this theme.

'Clash of civilizations'
Speaking after Obama, President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan, where more than a dozen people were killed in protests against the anti-Islam film, demanded insults to religion be criminalized.

"The international community must not become silent observers and should criminalize such acts that destroy the peace of the world and endanger world security by misusing freedom of expression," he said.

Turks chant anti US slogans and hold placards reading "America be damned, no to Islamophobia", during a demonstration against a film mocking Islam, at Beyazit Square in Istanbul. AFP Photo


Highlighting the anger of some, about 150 protesters demanded "justice" and chanted "there is no god but Allah" outside the UN building on Thursday. One placard read: "Blaspheming my Prophet must be made a crime at the UN"

Foreign ministers from the 57-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation met on Friday. The film topped the agenda.

"This incident demonstrates the serious consequences of abusing the principle of freedom of expression on one side and the freedom of demonstration on the other side," OIC secretary-general Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu told reporters.

"We are not saying stop free speech. We are staying stop hate speech," Ihsanoglu said.

"If the Western world fails to understand the sensitivity of the Muslim world, then we are in trouble," Ihsanoglu said.

Such provocations pose "a threat to international peace and security and the sanctity of life."

Ihsanoglu's remarks follow protests that erupted in Muslim countries after a film, "Innocence of Muslims," produced by a US citizen denigrated the Prophet Mohammad.


Some two dozen demonstrators were killed in protests that attacked symbols of US and the West, including diplomatic compounds.

The US Ambassador to Libya and three of his colleagues were killed in an attack on their compound in the eastern city of Benghazi during the same time.

Many of the protests were led or provoked by hardline puritan Muslims, who form small but growing minorities throughout the Islamic world.

Ihsanoglu said his call for a ban did not imply he was rewarding violent protesters, whom he sharply condemned.

Instead, he said such a ban would show a global sensitivity to the veneration which 1.5 billion Muslims have for the Prophet Mohammad. He said he was not calling for a ban on criticizing Islam, but specifically, on denigrating its founding prophet.

"You have to see that there is a provocation. You should understand the psychology of people who revere their prophet and don't want people to insult him," he said.

Secretary general of OIC Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is seen in Beijing. AFP/Files


Human Rights First and Muslim Public Affairs Council, two US-based advocacy groups, warned of the risks of regulating such freedoms.

"Countless incidents show that when governments or religious movements seek to punish offences in the name of combating religious bigotry, violence then ensues and real violations of human rights are perpetrated against targeted individuals," they said in a joint statement.

The 47-member UN Human Rights Council, dominated by developing states, has passed non-binding resolutions against defamation of religion for over a decade. Similar ones were endorsed in the UN General Assembly.

European countries, the United States and several Latin American nations in the council opposed the resolutions, arguing that while individual people have human rights, religions do not, and that existing UN pacts - if enforced - were sufficient to curb incitement to hatred and violence.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/popup/2012/9/27-09-pg17b.jpg


German foreign minister Guido Westerwelle attempted to dampen talk of a clash of civilizations on Thursday.

"Some would have us believe that the burning embassy buildings are proof of a clash of civilizations," Westerwelle said in his UN address.

"We must not allow ourselves to be deluded by such arguments. This is not a clash of civilizations. It is a clash within civilizations. It is also a struggle for the soul of the movement for change in the Arab world."

(With Reuters and AP inputs)

Read more:
Bin Laden hasn't failed
US powerless to act against anti-Islam inciters?
US filmmaker says he won't return to besieged home
Google rejects White House request to pull Mohammad film clip