In order to serve content on our website, we rely on advertising revenue which helps us to ensure that we continue to serve high quality unbiased journalism.
To know how to disable your Ad Blocker, please
Please refresh your page, once Ad Blocker is disabled
The Massachusetts Legislature has passed a bill outlawing 'upskirting' - the practice of secretly photographing under a woman's skirt – following public outrage over a court's ruling that declared it legal.
The uncommon speed of the bill was a marked shift for the Legislature, which often moves at a deliberative and sometimes glacial pace, but lawmakers said outrage over a Supreme Judicial Court ruling the day before spurred the quick action.
"It is sexual harassment. It's an assault on another person," senate president Therese Murray was quoted as saying by The Boston Globe.
"Women and children should be able to go to public places without feeling that they are not protected by the law," Murray said.
The state's highest court on Wednesday ruled that Massachusetts' criminal voyeurism law did not apply in a case where a man was accused of taking surreptitious cellphone photos and video up women's skirts on an MBTA trolley.
Speaker Robert A DeLeo said the court's decision demanded a law banning what he described as such "abhorrent" activity.
"We can send a message out there, to the women especially, that this type of action will not be tolerated – now will be illegal under Massachusetts law," he said.
The bill was sent on Thursday night to governor Deval Patrick and an aide said he would sign it.
The court's ruling came in the case of an Andover man accused of capturing images of women who sat across from him wearing skirts on an MBTA trolley on two occasions in 2010.
Michael Robertson was charged under the state's criminal voyeurism law, which was written before cellphone cameras were in wide use.
In its unanimous ruling, the Supreme Judicial Court said prosecutors did not prove he violated two key aspects of the law.
They failed to prove the women were photographed while nude or partially nude and that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
"Because the MBTA is a public transit system operating in a public place and uses cameras, the two alleged victims here were not in a place and circumstance where they reasonably would or could have had an expectation of privacy," the court said.
The bill passed on Thursday aims to address both issues, so acts such as those Robertson is accused of would be clearly illegal.
Under the bill, it would be a misdemeanour to take secret photos and videos of "the sexual or other intimate parts of a person under or around the person's clothing." The law would apply to times when a "reasonable person" would believe those parts of their body would not be publicly visible. Distributing those images could lead to felony charges and prison time.