Pakistan’s apex court to review new contempt law | world | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Sep 20, 2017-Wednesday
-°C
New Delhi
  • Humidity
    -
  • Wind
    -

Pakistan’s apex court to review new contempt law

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Monday began hearing a bunch of petitions against a new contempt of court law aimed at protecting top government functionaries, with chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry saying a quick decision is expected as the matter involves the independence of the judiciary.

world Updated: Jul 24, 2012 02:46 IST

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Monday began hearing a bunch of petitions against a new contempt of court law aimed at protecting top government functionaries, with chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry saying a quick decision is expected as the matter involves the independence of the judiciary.

A five-judge bench headed by the Chief Justice is hearing more than 25 petitions challenging the Contempt of Court Act of 2012 that was passed by Parliament, apparently to protect Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf from possible disqualification for refusing to revive graft cases against President Asif Ali Zardari.

Abdul Shakoor Paracha, the federal government counsel, asked the bench to form a full bench to hear the petitions in view of the importance of the matter.

He also sought more time to prepare for the case, saying he was appointed by the government only on Saturday.http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2012/7/24_07_pg17c.jpg

The Chief Justice remarked that only the apex court has the right to decide the type of bench that will hear a case.

He cited examples of similar cases being heard in the past by smaller benches and said the current bench has senior judges who could handle the matter.

The Chief Justice further said the case was very important as it involves the independence of the judiciary and there should be a quick decision.

Attorney General Irfan Qadir too sought two weeks to prepare for the case, saying a case such as the one against the contempt of court law had not been heard in the country's history.

However, the Chief Justice again responded that such cases had been heard by the apex court in the past.