Panama Papers: Ukraine’s Poroshenko defends record following ICIJ leak | world | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Jan 17, 2017-Tuesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

Panama Papers: Ukraine’s Poroshenko defends record following ICIJ leak

world Updated: Apr 05, 2016 14:49 IST

Highlight Story

Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko has found himself amid a political storm over the leaked documents from a Panamanian firm pointing at his offshore assets, with some of his political adversaries calling for his removal from office. (AP File Photo)

Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko defended his commitment to transparency on Monday after lawmakers called for an investigation into allegations contained in the ‘Panama Papers’ that he had used an offshore firm to avoid tax.

According to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), Poroshenko set up an offshore company to move his confectionery business, Roshen, to the British Virgin Islands in August 2014 during a peak in fighting between Ukraine and pro-Russian separatists.

Read more | From Nawaz to Putin: The politicians implicated in the Panama Papers

In response, Poroshenko said he had handed over the management of his assets to consulting and law firms on taking office.

“I believe I might be the first top official in Ukraine who treats declaring of assets, paying taxes, conflict of interest issues seriously,” he tweeted.

The law firm tasked with managing the sale of Roshen said the offshore firm was set up in accordance with Ukrainian law.

“The creation of a foreign structure does not affect the tax liabilities of the Roshen group in Ukraine, which continues to pay taxes,” Avellum said in an emailed statement.

“Any allegations of tax evasion are groundless.”

Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko’s advisers have insisted that the offshore business was part of corporate restructuring intended to facilitate the eventual sale of Roshen assets. (Efrem Lukatsky/AP Photo)

Poroshenko’s financial adviser, Makar Paseniuk, said the offshore firm was created to avoid a conflict of interests by allowing his assets to be controlled by third parties while he remained president.

A senior official in the General Prosecutor’s office said the leaked documents did not show that Poroshenko had committed any crime.

Lawmakers, including from within Poroshenko’s own faction, called for the creation of a parliamentary committee to investigate the allegations, which surfaced after a global leak of documents from a Panama-based law firm over the weekend.

The Panama Papers are 11.5 million in all, provided by an unnamed source to a German newspaper, Suddeutsche Zeitung, more than one year ago. They were taken from the files of the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, described as the fourth-largest offshore law firm in the world. Suddeutsche Zeitung then shared the data with ICIJ that in turn shared it with over 100 media organisations across the world.

Read More | Prosecutors open probe as world’s rich and powerful deny Panama Papers links

Under Ukrainian legislation, only parliament can initiate an investigation into a sitting president.

“It is the height of cynicism to open offshore companies at a time when hundreds of our soldiers are dying,” leader of the populist Radical Party Oleh Lyashko said on Facebook, adding any investigation could lead to Poroshenko’s impeachment.

The support of the Radical Party may be crucial in Poroshenko’s efforts to cobble together a new government and avoid a snap election.

The president has made several attempts to oust prime minister Arseny Yatseniuk’s government, saying it has lost the trust of the people, but he will likely need the support of smaller parties to assemble a parliamentary majority.

Read more | Panama Papers show Syria regime funded war efforts through shell firms

The IMF, the United States and the European Union are becoming frustrated with Ukraine’s patchy performance in tackling graft, and the Fund has threatened to halt aid until matters improve.

“The revelations of Poroshenko’s offshore accounts will further destabilise the Ukrainian government, which has been in a state of crisis for over a month,” said Daragh McDowell of the risk consultancy Verisk Maplecroft.

“Poroshenko’s credibility in the eyes of Ukraine’s Western allies will take a massive hit at a time when political infighting has already delayed the release of IMF loans.”

Poroshenko, who came to power after protests in 2014, has already faced criticism for not selling Roshen despite promising to do so.

Paseniuk said there had been no credible offers for the company so far, prompting those managing the sale to consider selling it off in parts. Talks to sell Roshen’s Russia-based Lipetsk factory were continuing, he said.