Reams of reports burdening diplomats
The nation's diplomats are drowning in paperwork, the State Department's inspector general says, churning out hundreds of mind-numbing reports every year that are too long, too expensive, hard to understand and nearly impossible to track.world Updated: Jan 26, 2011 23:11 IST
The nation's diplomats are drowning in paperwork, the State Department's inspector general says, churning out hundreds of mind-numbing reports every year that are too long, too expensive, hard to understand and nearly impossible to track.
The reports, mandated year after year by Congress and the State Department, cost the agency's far-flung embassy staff more than $50 million a year to complete, Inspector General Harold W. Geisel concluded in a 55-page report released this month. Completion of some reports, covering issues from human rights to child labor, has become a full-time job for employees based Washington and stationed abroad. And the same data and the level of detail must be collected by thinly staffed embassies in Liechtenstein (pop. 33,000) and as well as those in China (pop. 1.17 billion).
"The reports themselves have become encyclopedic in detail and length," Geisel wrote. "Shorter would be better," he said, adding that they contain "considerable" overlap in how data are compiled. He urged brevity.
Investigators surveyed staff at 55 embassies and visited small foreign posts in Bridgetown, Barbados, and in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. More than a third of staffs cited the burden of paperwork. Geisel stressed that the required reports provide policymakers with vital tools but that what goes into them needs to change so that those in small posts aren't overwhelmed. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
The report on "Goods Produced by Child or Forced Labor" (required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) contains much of the same information as the report on "Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor" .
(In exclusive partnership with The Washington Post. For additional content, visit www.washingtonpost.com)