Sunnis gain clout in West Asia
For years, the United States and its West Asia allies were challenged by the rising might of the so-called “Shiite crescent,” a political and ideological alliance backed by Iran that linked regional actors deeply hostile to Israel and the West; Neil Macfarquhar reports.world Updated: Nov 29, 2012 01:57 IST
For years, the United States and its West Asia allies were challenged by the rising might of the so-called “Shiite crescent,” a political and ideological alliance backed by Iran that linked regional actors deeply hostile to Israel and the West.
But uprising, wars and economics have altered the landscape of the region, paving the way for a new axis to emerge, one led by a Sunni Muslim alliance of Egypt, Qatar and Turkey. That triumvirate played a leading role in helping end the eight-day conflict between Israel and Gaza, in large part by embracing Hamas and luring it further away from the Iran-Syria-Hezbollah fold, offering diplomatic clout and promises of hefty aid.For the US, the shifting dynamics offer a chance to isolate a resurgent Iran, limit its access to the Arab world and make it harder for Tehran to arm its agents on Israel’s border. But the gains are also tempered, because while these Sunni leaders are willing to work with Washington, unlike the mullahs in Tehran, they also promote a radical religious-based ideology that has fueled anti-Western sentiment around the region.
Hamas – which received missiles from Iran that reached Israel’s northern cities – broke with the Iranian axis last winter, openly backing the rebellion against the Syrian president, Bashar Assad. But its affinity with the Egypt-Qatar-Turkey axis came to fruition this fall.
“That camp has more assets that it can share than Iran – politically, diplomatically, materially,” said Robert Malley, the Middle East program director for the International Crisis Group. “The Muslim Brotherhood is their world much more so than Iran.”
The Gaza conflict helps illustrate how West Asian alliances have evolved since the Islamist wave that toppled one government after another beginning in January 2011.
Iran had no interest in a cease-fire, while Egypt, Qatar and Turkey did.
But it is the fight for Syria that is the defining struggle in this revived Sunni-Shiite duel. The winner gains a prized strategic crossroads.
For now, it appears that that tide is shifting against Iran, there too, and that it might well lose its main Arab partner, Syria. The Sunni led-opposition appears in recent days to have made significant inroads against the government, threatening the Assad family’s rule of 40 years and its long alliance with Iran.
If Assad falls, that would render Iran and Hezbollah isolated as a Shiite Muslim alliance in an ever more sectarian West Asia, no longer enjoying a special street credibility as what Damascus always tried to sell as “the beating heart of Arab resistance.”
What will emerge from all the ferment remains obscure. Confusion reigns in terms of knowing how to deal with this new paradigm, one that could well create societies infused with religious ideology that Americans find difficult to accept. The new reality could be a weaker Iran and a more religiously conservative West Asia less beholden to the United States.
Already, Islamists have been empowered in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, while Syria’s opposition is being led by Sunni insurgents – including a growing number identified as jihadists, some sympathizing with al-Qaida. Qatar also helps finance Islamists all around the region. In Egypt, President Mohammed Morsi remains close to the Muslim Brotherhood. Turkey has kept strong relations with Washington while diminishing the authority of generals who were long-standing US allies.
The emerging Sunni axis has put not only Shiites at a disadvantage, but also the old school leaders who once allied themselves with Washington.
The old guard members in the Palestinian Authority are struggling to remain relevant at a time when their failed 20-year quest to end the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands makes them seem both anachronistic and obsolete.
“Hamas has always argued that it is the future of the changes in the region because of its revolutionary nature, that it is part of the religious political groups who have been winning the revolutions,” said Ghassan Khatib, an official at Birzeit University.
Egypt, Qatar and Turkey all want a more quiet, stable West Asia and say this requires an end to the Israeli occupation. But the new Islamist governments do not talk about a two-state solution much, so analysts believe a long-term truce is more likely.
But these countries will not supply arms, however, so Hamas will maintain contacts with Tehran. Khaled Meshal, the Hamas leader, told CNN that ties are “not as it used to be in the past, but there is no severing of relations.”