St Stephen’s principal says he had asked victim to change PhD guide
Countering charges that he tried shielding a teacher accused of molesting a PhD student, St Stephen’s college principal Valson Thampu on Sunday claimed he had offered the girl to change the guide but she had “refused” to accept the suggestion.delhi Updated: Jun 22, 2015 09:46 IST
Countering charges that he tried shielding a teacher accused of molesting a PhD student, St Stephen’s college principal Valson Thampu on Sunday claimed he had offered the girl to change the guide but she had “refused” to accept the suggestion.
“When the girl had approached me with the complaint she had insisted that the matter not be treated as one of sexual harassment to solely ensure that her PhD is completed on time. Understanding her concern, I suggested her to change the guide but she had not accepted the suggestion and insisted on completing the remaining research under him,” Thampu said.
An FIR has been registered against Satish Kumar, an assistant professor in St Stephen’s chemistry department, after the PhD student filed a complaint alleging sexual harassment by him.
The student, who is doing her PhD under Kumar, has also alleged that college principal Valson Thampu tried to protect him when the matter was reported to the college authorities.
According to the complaint, Kumar — who also discharges the duties of the bursar — molested the complainant on October 15, 2013.
The student has also accused him of stalking her, passing lewd remarks and making inappropriate physical contact for months before the incident.
Kumar once even threatened to “pour sulfuric acid on her if she didn’t wear a yellow sari to college”, the complaint read.
The complainant alleged that Thampu discouraged her from filing a sexual harassment case, leaving her with two options — “go to Delhi University’s grievance redressal cell and jeopardise my degree or term the issue an academic problem”.
She also maintained that 80% of her research was completed and change of guide was not feasible at that stage.
“I had myself insisted that it is a serious matter and should be referred to the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), a statutory body meant to address such cases. The Principal does not have, as such, any authority over her. I could not have prevented her from seeking redressal from the relevant committee. I have no coercive power on her,” he said.