There is still hope for Lalu Prasad | delhi | Hindustan Times
Today in New Delhi, India
Aug 15, 2018-Wednesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

There is still hope for Lalu Prasad

Although the Representation of the People Act disqualifies convicted persons from contesting elections, the top court said they can, however, contest if a superior court stayed both his conviction and sentence. Who said what | Lalu may still have a few tricks up his sleeve

delhi Updated: Oct 03, 2013 18:05 IST
Satya Prakash
Satya Prakash
Hindustan Times
Lalu Prasad,fodder scam,former bihar chief minister

Notwithstanding his conviction and sentencing in the fodder scam case, former Bihar chief minister Lalu Prasad can still contest elections, as the Supreme Court has left an escape route for convicted politicians.

A bench headed by justice AK Patnaik, which on July 10 ordered immediate disqualification of legislators on conviction, said a convicted person could contest an election if his/her conviction and sentence — both were stayed by a superior court.

Under Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, a convicted person becomes disqualified to contest elections.

The SC verdict, however, said under Section 389(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, an appellate court could stay both the order of conviction and sentence.

Exercising their inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the code, high courts too could do it.

But “an order granting stay of conviction is not the rule but is an exception to be resorted to in rare cases depending upon the facts of a case”, the bench clarified quoting from an earlier verdict.

“Where the execution of the sentence is stayed, the conviction continues to operate. But where the conviction itself is stayed, the effect is that the conviction will not be operative from the date of stay. An order of stay, of course, does not render the conviction non-existent, but only non-operative,” it said.

In January 2007, the SC had stayed the conviction and sentence of cricketer-turned-BJP politician Navjot Singh Sidhu in a road rage death case, paving his way for contesting the Amritsar Lok Sabha by-poll necessitated by his resignation.

“It is not possible to hold, as a matter of rule,... that in order to prevent any person who has committed an offence from entering Parliament or the Legislative Assembly, the order of conviction should not be suspended. The courts have to interpret the law as it stands and not on considerations which may be perceived to be morally more correct or ethical,” it had said.

But the SC refused similar relief to former Rajya Sabha MP DP Yadav’s son Vikas Yadav, sentenced to four-year imprisonment in the Jessica Lall murder case, for contesting 2007 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

First Published: Oct 01, 2013 01:04 IST