'US provided regular and consistent information'
India and the US continued to differ over the issue of sharing of specific information prior to 2008 Mumbai terror attacks with New Delhi asserting that it was "disappointed" on not being given specific inputs and Washington maintaining that it provided "regular and consistent" information.delhi Updated: Oct 27, 2010 19:24 IST
India and the US continued to differ over the issue of sharing of specific information prior to 2008 Mumbai terror attacks with New Delhi asserting that it was "disappointed" on not being given specific inputs and Washington maintaining that it provided "regular and consistent" information.
Home Secretary G K Pillai said Indian agencies were "disappointed" with not being provided specific information on David Headley while US Ambassador to India Timothy J Roemer told reporters that US provided "regular and consistent" information to India even before 26/11 attacks.
".....The US shared intelligence on a regular and consistent basis with the government of India prior to the Mumbai attacks. We have also shared information with the government of India after the Mumbai attacks. Now, it's historic and unprecedented in nature. It is saving lives on a daily basis," Roemer said.
He was asked about Pillai's remarks that agencies here were "disappointed" that specific information was not provided by the US which could have helped the country arresting Headley on his second visit before the attacks.
Talking about his experience as a 9/11 Commission member, Roemer said even after being the American Commission, the probing body was not given access to one of the accused and masterminds of terror attacks on the US, Khalid Seikh Mohammed.
"When India asked America for access to Headley, we gave it. Because India is our strategic partner and our friend and somebody with whom we share intelligence on regular and consistent basis.
"So, India could sit down with Headley and ask him what happened prior to Mumbai. We are not afraid what he will say. In fact, we provided that opportunity to India to ask anything they want," the US envoy said.
India has been maintaining that US lacked in providing specific information and only gave "general information" prior to 26/11.
"In the last few months, once Headley case surfaced, we have had interactions and exchanges with the American authorities into investigations. Before 26/11, we did not have anything more than very general, non-specific information on these warnings and threats," Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao had said.
According to some media reports, Headley's two wives had reportedly told FBI over a year prior to the Mumbai attacks that he was working with LeT and planning attacks in India.
The reports suggested that the US did not pass on these specific inputs to India, which could have helped avert 26/11 strikes.