The judiciary needs to evolve a robust set of principles on the basis of which it will, on its own, differentiate its interventions on matters which are not related to law and are actually policy questions(PTI Photo)
The judiciary needs to evolve a robust set of principles on the basis of which it will, on its own, differentiate its interventions on matters which are not related to law and are actually policy questions(PTI Photo)

Judicial calibration of policies is unwise

The judiciary must recognise that there are inherent limitations to the exercise of its powers when it comes to policy questions.
By C Raj Kumar
UPDATED ON MAY 24, 2016 01:23 AM IST

The recent observations of finance minister Arun Jaitley about the role of the judiciary in adjudicating upon a number of policy matters has sharpened the debate over separation of powers and constitutional obligations of the judiciary as a counter majoritarian institution. The minister observed that “judicial review is the legitimate domain of the judiciary but then a Lakshmanrekha has to be drawn by all the institutions themselves. Lakshmanrekha is very vital”. He added: “Executive decisions are to be taken by the executive and not the judiciary”. These are important observations and reflect the collective concerns not only of the government, but also of other institutions of democracy.

I believe the judiciary will not disagree with the separation of powers principle articulated by Jaitley. The real difficulty is in relation to where the Lakshmanrekha should be drawn. Historically, the judiciary has been progressive and inclusive in interpreting the provisions of the Constitution to uphold justice. The evolution of public interest litigation, liberal and progressive interpretation of rules, expansive interpretation of fundamental rights and directive principles of state policy, invoking the writ of continuing mandamus, recognition of substantive and procedural due process as tools to fulfil the values of constitutionalism, all these have been widely appreciated. This indeed is the strength of India’s judiciary led by the Supreme Court of India.

Given this backdrop, the debates on the relationship between the judiciary, executive and legislature are happening at the right time. The judiciary is facing twin challenges. First, responding to the enormous challenges of dealing with delays and pendency. Second, meeting social expectations and civil society demands on judicial intervention in almost every aspect of the governmental decision-making processes. Arbitrariness and violations of constitutional principles are at the heart of appeals for justice.

Read | Judiciary must draw its own ‘Lakshman rekha’: Arun Jaitley

The following principles can inform us of what is at stake and enable institutions of government to exercise their powers in an effective manner, respecting the separation of powers doctrine. First, law policy and judicial intervention: The separation of powers doctrine is about the legislature having the prerogative of making laws; the executive being entrusted with the responsibility to implement laws; and the judiciary vested with legal and constitutional powers to adjudicate disputes and review both legislation and the executive actions for their compliance with the Constitution.

Read | There are flaws in the SC drought ruling

The judiciary needs to evolve a robust set of principles on the basis of which it will, on its own, differentiate its interventions on matters which are not related to law and are actually policy questions. Elected governments are best suited to make policy choices. They are better placed to determine the suitability of particular policy choices. But the judiciary must intervene if any, or all of these powers, are arbitrarily exercised. It is not all that difficult to tell, a priori, what is law and what is policy. The real difficulty arises when enforcement of law and implementation of policy results in a clear violation of fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.

Second, constitutional norms and institutional limitations: The judiciary is vested with the obligation to ensure that all the wings of the government follow constitutional norms. Our courts have intervened in many matters that appear, at first blush, to be substantive questions of public policy, as opposed to law. In such matters the judiciary interprets issues from the standpoint of upholding rights and values of justice. The judiciary must recognise that there are inherent limitations to the exercise of judicial powers when it comes to its policy questions.

Read | The SC’s ruling on drought should push the State to get its act together

In the landmark case, SR Bommai v Union of India, the Supreme Court, in relation to the exercise of the emergency powers under Article 356, observed, “The opinion which the President would form on the basis of the Governor’s report or otherwise would be based on his political judgment…The temptation to delve into the President’s satisfaction may be great but the courts would be well advised to resist the temptation for want of judicially manageable standards…”

Three, judicial restraint and executive accountability: The judiciary must show much more restraint when it is asked to decide upon questions of policy. Determining correctly what properly constitutes a question of policy calls for competencies that the judiciary may not possess. There are several instances where the Supreme Court may have crossed the lakshmanrekha.

In 2012 the Court ordered interlinking of rivers. This was criticised as a ‘disquieting judgment’ because it encroached into the executive domain. Even if a citizen’s right to water is a fundamental right that gives the Supreme Court some rationale to review executive actions, to order the interlinking of rivers, in the face of clear executive unwillingness to do so (which was supported by expert evidence), is a clear example of the Court overstepping its boundaries and getting into the domain of policy making. However, there have been other judgments, including a 2013 order directing the creation of an Independent Civil Servants Boards within three months. This was positively received as it undid the injustice done to a civil servant while seeking executive accountability.

Why must the judiciary exercise self-restraint in policy matters without violating fundamental rights? Because it lacks wherewithal and competencies to grasp all the ramifications of policy choices. A decision of the Supreme Court is the law of the land (Art. 143 of the Constitution). When courts decide what policies should be legally mandated, it will need revision judgments to change those policies in the public interest. Judicial calibration of policies is unwise.

C Raj Kumar is founding vice-chancellor of OP Jindal Global University and the Dean of Jindal Global Law School. The views expressed are personal .

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
app
Close
A medical worker inoculates a nurse with a Covid-19 coronavirus vaccine, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, January 18, 2021. (AFP)
A medical worker inoculates a nurse with a Covid-19 coronavirus vaccine, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, January 18, 2021. (AFP)

Autopsy of a pandemic: Hold China, WHO accountable

By
UPDATED ON JAN 20, 2021 06:11 AM IST
The findings of a new report are an affirmation of what has long been regarded — but not acknowledged — as damaging negligence by Beijing and WHO
Close
Farm unions have not responded to the government’s offer to amend the laws, or to the Supreme Court’s directive to cooperate with a committee meant to examine the issue in detail (PTI)
Farm unions have not responded to the government’s offer to amend the laws, or to the Supreme Court’s directive to cooperate with a committee meant to examine the issue in detail (PTI)

Don’t let challenges turn intractable | HT Editorial

UPDATED ON JAN 19, 2021 06:20 AM IST
Both the China ingression and the stance of the farm unions are disparate issues, born out of their own specific histories
Close
According to a news report, US President-elect Joe Biden has appointed at least 20 Indian-Americans, with 17 of them in White House positions — 13 of the 20 also happen to be women. (AFP)
According to a news report, US President-elect Joe Biden has appointed at least 20 Indian-Americans, with 17 of them in White House positions — 13 of the 20 also happen to be women. (AFP)

Under Biden, the rise of Indian-Americans

By HT Editorial
UPDATED ON JAN 17, 2021 07:16 PM IST
India would do well to cultivate them, as it would cultivate any US official at high levels, but respect their identity beyond their Indian roots.
Close
A health worker carries a carton containing vaccines during the delivery of the first consignment of 1,000 vials of Bharat Biotech's COVAXIN, Jaipur, January 13, 2021 (Himanshu Vyas/ Hindustan Times)
A health worker carries a carton containing vaccines during the delivery of the first consignment of 1,000 vials of Bharat Biotech's COVAXIN, Jaipur, January 13, 2021 (Himanshu Vyas/ Hindustan Times)

And the vaccine is here

By HT Editorial
UPDATED ON JAN 15, 2021 07:46 PM IST
When India begins its coronavirus vaccination drive on Saturday, it will start with some of the biggest numbers: 300,000 potential recipients, 3,006 centres, and over 16 million doses already at hand
Close
Prime Minister KP Oli’s unconstitutional move to dissolve Parliament (the new Nepali Constitution does not give the PM the right to do so) has led to a de facto split in the Nepal Communist Party (NCP). (Getty Images)
Prime Minister KP Oli’s unconstitutional move to dissolve Parliament (the new Nepali Constitution does not give the PM the right to do so) has led to a de facto split in the Nepal Communist Party (NCP). (Getty Images)

Delhi’s balancing act with Nepal | HT Editorial

By HT Editorial
UPDATED ON JAN 15, 2021 08:37 AM IST
Nepal’s foreign minister Pradeep Gyawali is in Delhi for a bilateral meeting
Close
The ruling puts the provisions of SMA on a par with personal laws which require no notice period (PTI)
The ruling puts the provisions of SMA on a par with personal laws which require no notice period (PTI)

Upholding the right to liberty and privacy | HT Editorial

By HT Editorial
UPDATED ON JAN 15, 2021 08:37 AM IST
The Allahabad High Court has upheld the fundamental right to liberty and privacy with its ruling that a 30-day notice is not mandatory for those seeking to get married under the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954
Close
WhatsApp, the most popular mobile communication tool in the world, is going to great lengths to explain that its new use policy does not jeopardise the privacy of its users by sending additional data to its parent company, Facebook. (REUTERS)
WhatsApp, the most popular mobile communication tool in the world, is going to great lengths to explain that its new use policy does not jeopardise the privacy of its users by sending additional data to its parent company, Facebook. (REUTERS)

To big tech, India must send a message

UPDATED ON JAN 13, 2021 10:35 PM IST
WhatsApp’s new policy is now a strong reminder of why India must expedite work on its own data protection law so that Indians have a right to say to big tech — “We don’t agree”.
Close
A man holds the flags of India and the US while people take part in the 35th India Day Parade, New York, August 16, 2015 (REUTERS)
A man holds the flags of India and the US while people take part in the 35th India Day Parade, New York, August 16, 2015 (REUTERS)

Widening strategic trust

By HT Editorial
UPDATED ON JAN 13, 2021 11:14 PM IST
Much of the recent history of the relationship between India and the United States has revolved around creating strategic trust between the two countries
Close
The Narendra Modi government has, to its credit, also unleashed important second-generation reforms in critical sectors such as labour and agriculture during the pandemic(PTI)
The Narendra Modi government has, to its credit, also unleashed important second-generation reforms in critical sectors such as labour and agriculture during the pandemic(PTI)

The economy is looking up | HT Editorial

By HT Correspondent | Hindustan Times
UPDATED ON JAN 08, 2021 08:01 PM IST
Focus on public spending, demand, and helping the informal sector
Close
US President Donald Trump speaks in Washington, January 6, 2021(REUTERS)
US President Donald Trump speaks in Washington, January 6, 2021(REUTERS)

The destructive legacy of Donald Trump | HT Editorial

UPDATED ON JAN 07, 2021 07:40 PM IST
The US has witnessed one of the darkest days in its history. Hold the president accountable
Close
A farmer sitting during an ongoing protest against the new farm laws, Singhu border, New Delhi, January 7, 2020(ANI)
A farmer sitting during an ongoing protest against the new farm laws, Singhu border, New Delhi, January 7, 2020(ANI)

Farm unions must be flexible | HT Editorial

UPDATED ON JAN 07, 2021 07:39 PM IST
The government has been open. It is time for farm leaders to reciprocate
Close
Mr Mukherjee, a long-term parliamentarian, noted the trend of parliamentary disruptions and wrote how “appalled” he was with the “callousness” with which disruptions were used(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)
Mr Mukherjee, a long-term parliamentarian, noted the trend of parliamentary disruptions and wrote how “appalled” he was with the “callousness” with which disruptions were used(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)

Chronicling the role of institutions | HT Editorial

By HT Correspondent | Hindustan Times
PUBLISHED ON JAN 06, 2021 08:21 PM IST
Pranab Mukherjee’s final memoir’s greater value — beyond the insights on parties and individuals — lies in its assessment of the institutions
Close
Mr Juster suggested that the idea of self-reliance, if taken beyond a certain point, would weigh down the trajectory of bilateral cooperation in defence and economics(Prabhas Roy)
Mr Juster suggested that the idea of self-reliance, if taken beyond a certain point, would weigh down the trajectory of bilateral cooperation in defence and economics(Prabhas Roy)

Where India and US diverge | HT Editorial

By HT Correspondent | Hindustan Times
UPDATED ON JAN 07, 2021 07:20 AM IST
With an eye on China, both countries must narrow the gap on defence, tech and trade
Close
The relatives of a person injured in the collapse of a roof at Murad Nagar, Ghaziabad, January 3, 2021(Sakib Ali /Hindustan Times)
The relatives of a person injured in the collapse of a roof at Murad Nagar, Ghaziabad, January 3, 2021(Sakib Ali /Hindustan Times)

Ghaziabad roof collapse: The challenge of maintaining public infra

UPDATED ON JAN 06, 2021 06:14 AM IST
While the swift action taken by the administrationpraiseworthy, the roof collapse is symptomatic of a larger problem that is rampant across India — the failure of the government machinery to not just ensure good quality public infrastructure (all built with public money), but also force contractors to keep to guaranteed timelines and maintain infrastructure projects in good shape during their lifecycle
Close
Whatever the opposition put up by China, if India shows it has the diplomatic skills to get other countries to work together, the case for it being a permanent member will become irrefutable.(PTI)
Whatever the opposition put up by China, if India shows it has the diplomatic skills to get other countries to work together, the case for it being a permanent member will become irrefutable.(PTI)

India at the horse shoe table

UPDATED ON JAN 06, 2021 06:15 AM IST
As it enters the UNSC, New Delhi must focus on what is feasible and show its abilities
Close
SHARE
Story Saved
OPEN APP